Advertising

Blog Roll
Who's My Legislator?

Virginia Blogs
All Things Education
Augusta Free Press
Bacon's Rebellion
Crew of 42
DemRulz
Dixie Pig
Greater Greater Washington
Loudoun Progress
Moonhowlings
Ox Road South Blog
Pilot on Politics" blog
Power for the People
Richmonder
Richmond Sunlight
RVA Politics
Shad Plank
Vivian Paige
Waldo Jaquith


Find more about Weather in Arlington, VA
Click for weather forecast
Search




Advanced Search


GLBT

Josh Israel Reports from Last Night's Fairfax County Public School Board Curriculum Meeting

by: lowkell

Fri May 22, 2015 at 08:53:59 AM EDT

Thanks to Josh Israel for the following, excellent report from last night's Fairfax County Public School Board meeting.
While there were likely 100+ opponents of LGBT equality at last night's Fairfax County School Board meeting, led by Andrea Lafferty of the SPLC-designated hate group the Traditional Values Coalition and far-right former Fairfax School Board Member Mychele Brickner (R), wearing "Respect Parental Choice" stickers, this meeting was significantly calmer than the one a couple of weeks ago. Many of the opponents seemed confused about the fact that, under the proposed curriculum changes, parents will still be able to opt-out their kids from the portions of Family Life Education and that the topics being moved from the Family Life Education curriculum to the health curriculum are topics unrelated to sexual orientation and gender identity.

There were about 25 of us supporters of equality there to show our support and Robert Rigby Jr., Alexandra Dixon, Metro DC PFLAG dad Phil Hicks, and (via video) a current out FCPS high school student each gave eloquently and heartfelt testimony about why this curriculum is a matter of life and death for LGBT and questioning kids.

There's More... :: (2 Comments, 233 words in story)

Audio: EW Jackson Talks to Anti-#LGBT Fairfax County School Board Member Elizabeth Schultz

by: lowkell

Tue May 12, 2015 at 10:51:07 AM EDT

(UPDATE: Audio of about 1/2 hour of the call now available in the comments section. - promoted by lowkell)

This should be fun! :) Oh, and if you want to watch the virulent, extreme anti-LGBT Schultz in action, leading the angry mob, see here for video from last Thursday night's Fairfax County Public School Board meeting.

Discuss :: (2 Comments)

Video: Heated Debate Over Transgender Rights in Fairfax County Public Schools

by: lowkell

Thu May 07, 2015 at 19:58:20 PM EDT

UPDATE: See full video of last night's Fairfax County Public Schools meeting below. Also, superb job by Joshua Israel (former head of the Virginia Partisans Gay and Lesbian Democratic Club) a little while ago in Fairfax, especially given that the audience is filled with people who are clearly, vehemently opposed to this policy change. By the way, prior to Joshua Israel, a speaker actually claimed that this nondiscrimination ordinance could result in an increased suicide rate among transgender kids, as well more sex crimes by "predators." These people have wayyyyy too much time on their hands, and clearly not enough access to accurate information, let's just leave it at that.

UPDATE 6 am Friday: Joshua Israel writes on his Facebook page: "Very very proud to say that 10 of Fairfax's 12 school board members voted tonight to add gender identity to the FCPS non-discrimination policy. Proud to say that I made it through my speech in support without breaking down, even though the room was mostly filled with screaming, angry, anti-LGBT activists."

Also, House of Delegates Democratic candidate Joana Garcia writes: "Appalling behavior at the school board meeting tonight. From the woman out in the lobby who mumbled under her breath for the mom to 'take your screaming kid outside why don't ya' to another who said 'why not' to the statement by a board member 'we should not discriminate against anyone'. At least 5 people removed from the meeting due to disruptive behavior."

Catherine Read writes: "People turned their backs on Ted Velkoff when he quoted scripture. Because . . . you know . . . that's would Jesus would do. That woman in black commented and yelled throughout the meeting. Disrepectuful, ugly . . . this was like sitting with the extras from the movie '42.'"

Sen. Adam Ebbin writes: "Hats off to Josh Israel for reasoned and eloquent testimony in support of Fairfax County Schools' new policy against discrimination based on gender identity!"

UPDATE 9:07 pm: John Riley tweets, "Schultz motion to postpone fails 2-10." Also: "McElveen: misinformation is that this policy will not change practices in #FCPS"; "Anti-side has older white men walking up and down aisles. Making hand signals to opponents in crowd. Lots of outbursts"; "Crowd boos McElveen for calling transgender rights 'civil rights struggle of our generation.'"; "Moon: school administrators will meet with people who claim to be transgender and determine if genuine. Change not putting anyone at risk;" "McLaughlin decries misinformation. As of today, you thought your children were safe. They are and still will be. Garza already practicing it."

FCPS Student Rep Harris LaTeef writes: "Thank you to the Fairfax County School Board for staying calm and professional even when others certainly were not this evening. I thank you and history will thank you."

UPDATE 8:17 pm: Jarrod Nagurka tweets, "Shameful. Dan Stork just seconded motion to postpone inclusion of gender identity in Fairfax nondiscrimination policy."

UPDATE 8:15 pm: John Riley of Metro Weekly magazine tweets: "Fredy Burgos, who opposed @EFillerCorn last election, says policy will undermine 1st Amendment rights of anti-trans students...Burgos decries heavy-handed federal government interfering in local schools. Talking about genital mutilation, HIV rates...Hispanics and blacks will be worst affected by policy. B/C they are largely Christians, Burgos calls #Policy1450 'racist.' Standing ovation."

UPDATE 8:06 pm: Democratic campaign manager Jarrod Nagurka, who is at the meeting, just wrote on Facebook, "Wow. I was just called a "gangster" and "racist" for supporting nondiscrimination policy. You can't make this stuff up." Jarrod also tweets, "Wow. Speaker claim nondiscrimination policy including gender identity is RACIST and would INCREASE black/hispanic dropout rates." Uh huh.

Discuss :: (7 Comments)

Family Foundation Brings Its Speeecial Brand of (anti-LGBT) "Family Values" to Fairfax

by: lowkell

Mon May 04, 2015 at 11:20:30 AM EDT

Charming as always from these same fine folks: How Do You Get a 100% Rating from the Far-Far-Far Right "Family Foundation?"; The Family Foundation objects to a rainbow flag flying at the Richmond Federal Reserve; Ken Cuccinelli to Rally This Evening with "gay-bashing, abortion-hating, home-school-loving group"; etc. This time, they're on a rampage against the horrors of one or two little kids possibly going pee-pee in the bathroom. I mean, start down that slippery slope, and next thing you know. "Mr. Smith" could start "wearing a dress" or even become "Ms. Smith." Yeah, these people have waaaaaayyy too much time on their hands, and are spending waaaaayyyy too much of that time thinking about other people's private parts, sex lives, etc.

Discuss :: (1 Comments)

Virginia Christian Alliance Launches Crusade Against "transgenderism activity" in Schools

by: lowkell

Fri Apr 24, 2015 at 17:37:13 PM EDT

If you haven't seen it, I encourage you to check out this Think Progress story, on the far-right-wing, theocratic Virginia Christian Alliance's latest crusade.
Last month, Stafford County, VA, made national headlines when its school board unanimously voted to ignore guidance from both school district officials and the Department of Education that “sex” protections under Title IX protect transgender students’ use of facilities that match their identified gender. After some local parents complained, the school board ordered that a fourth grade student no longer be permitted to use the bathroom of the student’s identified gender. The school system in Gloucester, VA, is currently facing a federal civil rights complaint after it restricted a transgender sophomore boy to using only a single-stall restrooms or designated female restrooms.

In light of these stories, the conservative Virginia Christian Alliance (VCA) has launched a statewide campaign to demand school systems deal with "transgenderism activity" and "gender identity confusion" as "a serious medical mental disorder." In a letter sent to school boards across the Commonwealth of Virginia, the group’s chairman and president Donald N. Blake demanded to be “advised of any pending cases involving transgenderism that are presently before your school system” and the policies each system has in place to deal with transgender students. "Accommodation is not the answer," he wrote, "nor is accommodation in the best interest of the child." Though the American Psychological Association stopped classifying being transgender as a mental disorder in 2012, the letter cites a 2014 article by anti-LGBT Johns Hopkins professor Paul McHugh that argued that “the idea of sex misalignment is simply mistaken” and that transgender people should be treated like those with anorexia and bulimia nervosa. McHugh’s widely debunked claims about trans identities run counter to consensus of the medical profession.

Unsurprisingly, this isn't the first time the Virginia Christian Alliance has shown its bigotry. Back in December 2014, for instance, they teamed up with fellow bigoted extremist E.W. Jackson to attack Virginia Department of Health Interim Commissioner Dr. Marissa Levine, who is transgender, as having "a "serious mental illness" and "serious issues." Charming. Also see here for more about what this group believes, including "refuting Darwinian Evolution, Theistic Evolution, Gap and Age-Day Theories, and Progressive Creationism;" "refuting sexual promiscuity: adultery, fornication, heterosexual oral sex, pornography, incest and bestiality, pedophilia, and homosexuality;" and "refuting foreign cultures, legal precedents, languages and religions in opposition to Christianity." So yeah, these are the same people on a rampage about "transgenerism activity" here in Virginia, as opposed to say, fighting to "feed the hungry," "clothe the naked," working for social justice, and other priorities their religion actually calls for.

P.S. Can someone please point out to me in the New Testament, which presumably members of the Virginia **Christian** Alliance believe in, it urges people to be nasty, intolerant, bigoted, ignorant jerks?  Right, it doesn't.  

Discuss :: (1 Comments)

The GOP's "Religious Freedom" Fiasco: What Is, and Is Not, the Good News

by: Andy Schmookler

Thu Apr 02, 2015 at 14:26:05 PM EDT

It has been a remarkable turn of events in the story of these two states -- first Indiana, then Arkansas -- passing these so-called "Religious Freedom" measures.

It's a story that has been heartening for liberals/progressives -- and for good reason. The Republicans made their usual effort to make hay out of the bigotries they have encouraged in their base. And lo and behold, these craven tactics have blown up in their faces because the whole nation is watching and the national culture has moved far and fast away from that bigotry.

Why not enjoy that spectacle!

But it is also important to note what the story does not demonstrate: these events do not contradict the story that our politics are increasingly under the control of Big Money.

Rachel Maddow last night explained the powerful role that "business" -- including giants like Apple and Walmart -- has played in pushing both Governor Pence in Indiana to "fix" a measure he'd just signed, and Governor Hutchinson of Arkansas to announce his intention to veto a measure he'd advocated only days before.

It is true that "the people" have played a role in this: popular support of a non-discriminatory culture -- particularly among the workers (e.g.in the technology fields) many powerful business want to be attract -- has made this kind of bigotry "bad for business."

But still, it is very thanks to the power of Big Money that these GOP panderers to the worst in their base have had to back down.

There's More... :: (2 Comments, 157 words in story)

Virginia GOP Votes to Kill Bill Designating anti-LGBT Crimes as Hate Crimes

by: lowkell

Wed Jan 14, 2015 at 18:53:45 PM EST

The following statement is from the Democratic Party of Virginia: 
 
Well, that didn't take long. The 2015 General Assembly session started at noon and Senate Republicans already voted to kill a bill to designate anti-LGBT crimes as hate crimes. That's right -- if someone is assaulted, harassed or even killed due to their sexual orientation, it still won't be considered a hate crime.

Leading the charge to kill the bill was Mark Obenshain, who shamelessly pandered on sexual orientation in his 2013 campaign. Guess that was then, and this is now.
 
In Case You Missed It:

Associated Press
Discuss :: (0 Comments)

AG Mark Herring to Bob Marshall: Bigamy Illegal, Bisexuals and Transgenders Can Marry in VA

by: lowkell

Thu Dec 18, 2014 at 11:14:57 AM EST

My god, Virginia's Attorney General has to waste his time on crap like this? On the other hand, I suppose in a warped way that "Sideshow Bob" Marshall continues to provide invaluable entertainment, in a freak show sorta way, for Virginia. And that's gotta be worth something, ya know? :)

Discuss :: (1 Comments)

EW Jackson, "Virginia Christian Alliance" Attack Transgender Health Commissioner

by: lowkell

Thu Dec 04, 2014 at 10:55:49 AM EST

With the Virginia Board of Health meeting this morning to reconsider the draconian, unfair women's health clinic regulations put in place due to then-AG Ken Cuccinelli's bullying, it appears that the anti-LGBTQ bigots are out in force. That would be EW Jackson, who doesn't understand why he's called hateful for his anti-LGBTQ ravings, believes supporting a woman's right to control her own body makes one a "pro-abortion radical," and can't even spell "McAuliffe" correctly. It's also something called the "Virginia Christian Alliance," which falsely (and appallingly) claims that transgendered people like Virginia Department of Health Interim Commissioner Dr. Marissa Levine have a "serious mental illness." And while I certainly do NOT believe (as Erin Matson tweets; see the "flip" of this post) that most (or even many?) people working against abortion are "driven by gender-motivated hate," clearly some (like the "Virginia Christian Alliance" and EW Jackson) hold those views. And just as clearly, I hope we all can agree that type of intolerance and bigotry should be unacceptable in our society, whatever one's views about abortion rights.
There's More... :: (5 Comments, 4 words in story)

What the Heck is "Virginia Mass Resistance?"

by: lowkell

Mon Oct 27, 2014 at 16:24:19 PM EDT

My god, where do these people come from and why are they always right wingers?
Ex-gay activist Linda Wall, who has launched a new Religious Right group called Virginia Mass Resistance, promoted her organization in a Saturday interview with "Mission America" host Linda Harvey.

Wall described to Harvey her own experience of being "seduced" into homosexuality, which she said all started with "a glass of wine and marijuana."

"It was as if it was an instant addiction as to a drug," she said.

By the way, I Googled this Linda Wall person, and one of the first articles that appeared was Linda Wall: The anti-gay activist who molested an underage girl ("A conservative crusader seeking office in Virginia admits that she had sex with a middle-school girl who was her student in the 1970s"). Why am I not surprised? As a friend of mine put it, "It's always the most virulently anti-gay ones who have this in their background."  
Discuss :: (1 Comments)

Loudoun County Supervisor Eugene Delgaudio's latest anti-gay ravings

by: lowkell

Wed Oct 22, 2014 at 14:32:49 PM EDT

h/t: Towleroad:

Delgaudio: "You'll see men hand-in-hand skipping down to adoption centers to "pick out" a little boy for themselves." Sure, part of this is about raising money for himself, but to the extent he believes any of this, he's also just plain certifiable. So how does he keep getting reelected to the Loudoun County Board of Supervisors (as a Republican, of course)? Do voters actually AGREE with him on this extremist bigotry?  Or do most voters simply not show up to the polls on election day to toss this guy out on his a**? Either way, Delgaudio's a continuing disgrace to Loudoun County, and one you'd think they'd want to boot off their County Board.

The radical homosexuals claim you and other pro-Family Americans actually now support same-sex "marriage," special job preferences for homosexuals, and promotion of the homosexual lifestyle in schools.

Is it true? What do you say?

The American Morality Survey I'm sending you is specially coded and registered in your name.

I've included a link below so you can fill it out and return it to me right away.

You see, the radical homosexuals are storming through Washington demanding passage of their agenda.

And with the Democrats dominating the Senate and Barack Obama calling the shots in the White House, they say NOW is the time to push their perverse "lifestyle" on every man, woman and child in America.

And they insist YOU actually support them.

To make matters worse, more and more Republicans in Congress are coming out in favor of the Homosexual Agenda.

The Homosexual Lobby has already rammed through Thought Control and the repeal of Don't Ask, Don't Tell. I can only begin to imagine how much more damage the radical homosexuals will do now that they've broken the ranks of the opposition party.

As the President of Public Advocate of the United States, I've devoted thirty years to battling the radical homosexuals in Washington.

Backed by Hollywood celebrities, the media, and millions of your tax dollars, the radical homosexuals have many Congressmen, both Democrat AND Republican, quivering with fear -- and because of that they have a radical homosexual-friendly majority in control of Congress.

That's why pro-Family Senators and Congressmen are counting on me to find out if you really support the Gay Bill of Special Rights and homosexual "marriage" as the radical homosexuals claim.

Take the American Morality Survey
Frankly, if you really do support the radical Homosexual Agenda -- or if you just no longer care enough to stand up for the Family -- insiders in Congress say the entire Homosexual Agenda could pass in a matter of months.

Passage of the Homosexual Agenda will ignite a firestorm that will rip through families, communities and businesses:

* Special job rights for homosexuals. Businesses may have to adopt hiring quotas to protect themselves from lawsuits. Every homosexual fired or not hired becomes a potential federal civil rights lawsuit.

Radical homosexuals will terrorize daycare centers, hospitals, churches and private schools. Traditional moral values will be shattered by federal law.

* Same-sex marriages and adoptions. Wedding gown-clad men smooching before some left-wing clergyman or state official is just the beginning.

You'll see men hand-in-hand skipping down to adoption centers to "pick out" a little boy for themselves.

* The Homosexual Classrooms Act, which pushes their agenda into our schools. Your children or grandchildren will be taught homosexuality is moral, natural and good. High school children will learn perverted sex acts as part of "safe sex" education.

With condoms already handed out in many schools, radical homosexuals will have little trouble adopting today's "if it feels good do it" sex-ed curriculum to their agenda.

And to add insult to injury, lobbyists for the Homosexual Agenda are paid off with your tax dollars!

That's right, radical homosexual groups like the National Gay and Lesbian Task Force and ACT UP receive millions from the government.

Hundreds of millions of tax dollars flow to homosexual activists through funding for so-called AIDS awareness programs and research grants -- and I just read in the paper that cash even went to build a strip club!

One stormy night, I drove to a mailshop hidden deep in a nearly deserted stand of warehouses. I'd heard something was up and wanted to see for myself.

As I rounded the final turn, my eyes nearly popped. Tractor-trailers pulled up to loading docks, cars and vans everywhere and long-haired, earring-pierced men scurrying around running forklifts, inserters and huge printing presses.

Trembling with worry, I went inside. It was worse than I ever imagined.

Row after row of boxes bulging with pro-homosexual petitions lined the walls, stacked to the ceiling.

My mind reeled as I realized hundreds, maybe thousands, more boxes were already loaded on the tractor-trailers. And still more petitions were flying off the press.

Suddenly a dark-haired man screeched, "Delgaudio, what are you doing here?" Dozens of men began moving toward me. I'd been recognized.

As I retreated to my car, the man chortled, "This time, Delgaudio, we can't lose!"

Driving away, my eyes filled with tears as I realized he might be right. This time the radical homosexuals could win.

You see, even though homosexuals are just 1% of the population, if every one sent a petition to Congress, it would generate a tidal wave of two or three million petitions or more.

Hundreds of thousands of pro-homosexual petitions will soon flood Congress, and my friends in Congress tell me there's virtually nothing on Capitol Hill from the tens of millions of Americans like you who oppose the radical Homosexual Agenda and the Gay Bill of Special Rights.

I made up my mind that night to write to you and as many other patriotic Americans as possible. To stop the radical homosexuals and protect marriage, there must be an immediate outpouring of support from folks like you.

Will you help by clicking here to complete your American Morality Survey right away?

Take the American Morality Survey
Homosexual activists mock me in the halls of Congress. They say it's too late because Americans like you don't care enough to help, especially now with the Homosexual Lobby in control of Congress and the White House.

They say you support them. I tell them they are lying. They just laugh and tell me to give up.

Are they right? Should I just give up and let the radical homosexuals win?

Will you fight?

If, as I hope and pray, you still oppose the radical homosexuals and want to defend the Family and marriage, then please click here immediately to fill out your American Morality Survey and chip in $10 or $20 to Public Advocate right away.

I must tell you, your financial contribution is critical.
You see, while the radical homosexuals get tens of millions of tax dollars, Public Advocate gets no government funds.
Public Advocate relies on the generosity of Americans like you who give $10. A few special friends of Public Advocate give $20.

Take the American Morality Survey
For many Public Advocate supporters, a contribution of $5 is a sacrificial gift.

I only ask you to prayerfully consider what you can afford.

You see, I've stretched Public Advocate's resources to contact you and other select Americans who I believe are most likely to take a stand in these difficult times.

If you won't help, I'm afraid there is little more I can do.
But the fact is, even if every person responds, it won't be enough to counter all the radical homosexuals are doing.

And not everyone will respond. Some are cowed by how pro-Family Americans are portrayed on TV. Others will count on someone else to fight the fight and carry the load. I don't believe you are like that.

I've identified nearly 10 million families I believe would join our struggle for morality if only I can reach them. That's more than twice as many as all the homosexuals in America ... and most of these families represent two or three voters each. But without your financial help, I'll never be able to reach them.

My hope is you care enough to contribute sacrificially so I can reach these families.

A generous gift of $25 will let Public Advocate reach 45 more families. $50 will help us rally more than 97 homes. And a special gift of $100 will generate over 215 contacts.

Only you know whether chipping in $10, $20, or more is best suited to your budget.

I ask you to do what you can.

The radical homosexuals boast you support same-sex marriage, special job rights and the promotion of homosexuality in schools.

Please let Congress know the radical homosexuals are lying.

For the Family,

HON. EUGENE DELGAUDIO
President, Public Advocate of the United States

P.S. Radical homosexuals claim YOU support homosexual "marriage," special job rights and the promotion of homosexuality in schools -- and with Democrats controlling Congress and the White House, they think they cannot lose. Is it true? I pray it is not.

Please click here to fill out your American Morality Survey right away so I can prove to Congress and the media the radical homosexuals are lying about you.

And please chip in $10 or $20 to help Public Advocate defeat the Gay Bill of Special Rights and defend marriage and the Family.

Your contribution is critical to reaching the millions of families I know still care for the future.

Take the American Morality Survey
Contributions or gifts to Public Advocate of the U.S. are not tax deductible. Public Advocate is a nonprofit organization that fights the radical agenda of the Homosexual Lobby. Public Advocate receives no government funds. You may reach us at: Public Advocate, P.O. Box 1360, Merrifield, VA 22116; phone (703) 845-1808 http://publicadvocateusa.org/.

To help Public Advocate grow, please forward this to a friend.
Click this link to view online.

Discuss :: (1 Comments)

"Sideshow Bob" Marshall Completely Unhinged Over Demise of His Anti-Gay Hate Amendment

by: lowkell

Tue Oct 07, 2014 at 21:01:28 PM EDT

My god.
Today I requested an official opinion from Attorney General Mark Herring on the Constitutitionality of Virginia's Bigamy laws in light of the decision of the U.S. Supreme Court not to hear Virginia's Marriage Amendment case.

The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals said in their decison that, "Accordingly, we decline the Proponents' invitation to characterize the right at issue in this case as the right to same-sex marriage rather than simply the right to marry."

If the Virginia Marriage Amendment defining marriage as between one man and one woman has been overturned on the basis of the "right to marry" that that right surely extends to "throuples", those who identify as polyamourous, polygamists and any individual who whishes to marry who or what he/she "loves."

If it is the "right" of all people to marry who they love then I would like to know if it is the Attorney General's legal opinion that Virginia's bigamy and perhaps other laws realted to marriage are also Unconstitutional.

Attorney General Herring said in a speech yesterday, October 6, 2014, at the Arlington Court House that, "Today we celebrate a moment when we move closer to fulfilling the promise of equality..." I would like to know what further steps he believes are legally necessary to fulfill this promise.

The question is, who votes for this bigoted lunatic?

P.S. Click on the image to "embiggen."

Discuss :: (4 Comments)

Supreme Court "Stay" Order in "Bostic" Marriage Equality Case

by: lowkell

Wed Aug 20, 2014 at 15:18:04 PM EDT

Unfortunately, there will be no LGBT marriages tomorrow in Virginia. Hopefully, that situation will change very soon.

Discuss :: (7 Comments)

Virginia Asks Supreme Court for Expedited Review in Marriage Equality Case

by: lowkell

Mon Aug 18, 2014 at 17:28:22 PM EDT

From AG Herring's office: 

RICHMOND (August 18, 2014)--As requested by Chief Justice John Roberts, the Commonwealth of Virginia has filed its response to a motion by the Clerk of Prince William County to stay the 4th Circuit's ruling regarding marriage equality. In its brief, the Commonwealth of Virginia agrees that a stay is warranted because of unintended negative consequences if the Court later rules against marriage equality, and asks the Court to expedite its review of the case by treating the Clerk's motion as a cross-petition for certiorari, allowing it to consider the Clerk's arguments alongside Virginia's petition for certiorari to determine whether to review the case. This would be an unusual but not unprecedented action by the Supreme Court, but the request is appropriate given the importance of the issue.

 

"Throughout this process we have fought for equality while also recognizing the need for an orderly process," said Attorney General Herring. "I've worked to move the case along quickly and asked the Supreme Court to take this extraordinary step because I don't want this discriminatory ban to stay in place one day longer than necessary. However, a stay is warranted in light of the negative impact on Virginia children, families, and businesses if the Supreme Court eventually rules against marriage equality and forces an unwinding of Virginians' marriages, adoptions, inheritances, or workplace benefits."

 

As was the case at the district and appellate level, Attorney General Herring's filing on behalf of State Registrar of Vital Records Janet Rainey says the Commonwealth believes the courts ruled correctly in finding Virginia's marriage ban unconstitutional, but also believes a stay is warranted until the Supreme Court can definitively resolve the issue.

 

The Office of Attorney General is working with the Governor's Office and client state agencies to make reasonable preparations in the event that the Supreme Court does not stay the 4th Circuit's decision before the order takes effect at 8 a.m. on Thursday, August 21. This includes drafting an updated marriage license application through the State Registrar of Vital Records. 

Discuss :: (1 Comments)

Hilarious: Most Politicized AG in History Calls Mark Herring "Most Politicized" AG in Country

by: lowkell

Thu Aug 14, 2014 at 21:08:07 PM EDT

Not that Ken Cuccinelli has any sense of irony, but to hear the guy who wildly misused/abused his office "by using it as a blatantly partisan bully pulpit to attack Obamacare, illegal immigrants, homosexuals and climate-change scientists" and "to bully Virginia's Board of Health into a stance - unprecedented in state history - that could force most of the commonwealth's 20 or soabortion clinics to close" call current Virginia AG Mark Herring the "most politicized" Attorney General in the country is certainly the height of irony. To listen to that howler, check out 3:20 of the audio. In reality, of course, Cooch is just pissed because he's a raging homophobe and doesn't want to see LGBT Virginians treated equally to all other Virginians.

For his part, Mark Herring came to the same conclusion as many other state Attorneys General, that to keep defending a constitutional amendment that court after court has found blatantly violates the U.S. constitution's equal protection provisions is a complete waste of time, resources, and taxpayer money. Of course, AG Cuccinelli's entire four years in office was a case study in wasting time, resources, and taxpayer money, so there's a bit more irony for you, if you have a sense of irony of course (unlike Cuccinelli). ;)

P.S. Cuccinelli also claims says that Herring was "lying to voters to get elected;" "had to lie to become the Attorney General and then he turned on his clients." Seriously? On second thought, don't try to figure it out, just laugh derisively, sarcastically...or ironically? Heh.

Discuss :: (4 Comments)

VIRGINIA ASKS U.S. SUPREME COURT TO REVIEW MARRIAGE EQUALITY CASE

by: lowkell

Sat Aug 09, 2014 at 07:30:43 AM EDT

From AG Mark Herring's office: 

~ Herring is nation's first attorney general supporting marriage equality to prevail in federal district and appeals court and to petition the Supreme Court to quickly and finally answer these constitutional questions ~

 

RICHMOND(August 8, 2014) -- As announced earlier this week, Attorney General Mark Herring has filed a petition for a writ of certiorari in the Supreme Court of the United States asking the Court to review the district and appeals court's decisions striking down Virginia's same-sex marriage ban as unconstitutional. While Attorney General Herring and the Commonwealth have argued successfully for marriage equality in the lower federal courts, they are still able to request that the high court hear the case. Prince William County Clerk of Court Michèle McQuigg, who opposes marriage equality, has already said she intends to petition for certiorari, but by filing now, the Attorney General may enable the Court to consider the case more quickly.

 

"Many brave men and women have fought for years for the constitutional guarantee of marriage equality, and now, we are almost there," said Attorney General Herring. "It is time to discard these discriminatory bans and to recognize the humanity, dignity, and rights of gay and lesbian Americans seeking to forge life-long bonds. I believe this case will prove compelling for the Court because of the stringent, discriminatory nature of Virginia's marriage ban, the range of critical questions presented, the clear legal standing of the parties, and Virginia's historic role in 1967's Loving case ending bans on interracial marriage. Virginia got that case wrong. Now, we have a chance to get it right, and to help extend to all Americans the right to marry the person they love."

 

Attorney General Herring is the first state attorney general to successfully argue in court at the district and appellate levels that a state marriage ban is unconstitutional, and the first who supports marriage equality to petition the Supreme Court for review.


In arguing that the Court should review Virginia's case, the Attorney General's brief explains that:

There's More... :: (1 Comments, 610 words in story)

AG Mark Herring to Ask Supreme Court for Review of Marriage Equality Case

by: lowkell

Tue Aug 05, 2014 at 16:33:00 PM EDT

From AG Mark Herring's office:

 

VIRGINIA TO ASK SUPREME COURT FOR REVIEW OF MARRIAGE EQUALITY CASE

~ "We are nearly there." ~

 

RICHMOND (August 5, 2014)--Attorney General Mark R. Herring today announced that he will file a petition on Friday for a writ of certiorari with the Supreme Court of the United States asking it to hear Virginia's marriage equality case and definitively settle the constitutional issues for the Commonwealth and the rest of the country. Virginia's petition will be one of the first in the nation, after Utah filed its petition earlier today, allowing the Court to consider accepting Virginia's case at their September conference. The Commonwealth signaled its intention in a filing today with the 4th Circuit Court of Appeals, which last week agreed with Attorney General Herring's position that Virginia's same-sex marriage ban violates the U.S. Constitution. That filing requests that the Court stay its mandate pending the Supreme Court's decision whether to hear the case. The Prince William County Clerk of Court announced last Friday that she intended to file a petition for certiorari. Attorney General Herring's filing ensures that no delay arises during the available 90-day window to petition for certiorari.


 

"Throughout this case, I have fought for the fundamental rights of Virginians and the quickest possible resolution," said Attorney General Herring. "I believe the district and appeals courts ruled correctly in striking down Virginia's discriminatory marriage ban, but it has long been clear that the Supreme Court will likely have the final word. I want that decision to come as soon as possible and I want the voices of Virginians to be heard. This case has moved forward at an incredibly swift pace, and I look forward to a final resolution that affirms the fundamental right of all Virginians to marry."


 

Virginia's case presents a number of legal questions that could be settled by the Supreme Court, including whether states can prevent same-sex couples from marrying and whether states can refuse to recognize valid marriages performed in other states.


 

As it has done throughout the case, the Commonwealth has asked the 4th Circuit for a stay of its ruling until all appeals are final. The motion notes that the Supreme Court has already issued stays in similar cases, the complexity of unwinding marriages and transactions that depend on them--like adoptions, inheritance, tax filings, or filings of birth or death certificates-- and the fact that this case has moved extremely quickly and can be resolved in the very near future.


 

The Commonwealth's motion concludes as follows:


 

"This case has moved with unusual speed.  It was argued in the district court in February and in this Court in May, and it is now ready for review by the Supreme Court.  Speed is warranted, for it is unjust for Virginia's same-sex couples to have to wait even a little while longer for the promise of the Fourteenth Amendment to be fulfilled.   As this Court observed, across the Commonwealth, more than 2,500 same-sex couples are raising more than 4,000 children.  They are our fellow Virginians.  And the Attorney General is committed to ensuring that the government stops treating them as second-class citizens. 


 

"It is with great reluctance, therefore, that the Attorney General agrees that a stay is warranted.  The unintended consequences that will befall the Commonwealth and its people if the injunction takes effect prematurely, and the clear signal sent by [the Supreme Court] in Evans and Kitchen II, show the necessity of staying the mandate until the Supreme Court can conclusively resolve what may well be the most important civil rights issue of our time. 


 

"We are nearly there." 

Discuss :: (0 Comments)

Just Remember, Virginia Republicans Nominated This Lunatic for Lt. Governor

by: lowkell

Tue Jun 24, 2014 at 15:07:09 PM EDT

Yep, the guy who Virginia Republicans nominated for Lieutenant Governor last year, E.W. Jackson, is once again showing his true colors. This time, he's teaming up with Pastor Charles Flowers from San Antonio for another heapin' helpin' o' crazy (and Obama bashing, of course). So who is Pastor Charles Flowers you ask? I'll let ABC News take it from here.
The camp is run by Charles Eugene Flowers, a San Antonio-based pastor known for tough-love tactics to rein in troubled teens.

But Siobahn said that Flowers was anything but caring. "Pastor Flowers was mean," the girl said. "Forceful, mean and strict."

According to the girl, after she fell behind on a run one morning, Flowers yelled at her and had an assistant hold her down. He then tied one end of a rope to her waist, Siobahn said, and the other to his van.

Every time she fell, Siobahn says, she was dragged along a gravel road. "I was, like, so scared," she said. The incident left the girl's knees and legs scraped and bruised.

Bobbi Greer, who worked at the ranch where the incident occurred, said the camp showed less than loving care toward the teen a day earlier. "The torture to this girl went on all afternoon," she said.

Flowers and the 20-year-old assistant, meanwhile, were arrested and charged with aggravated assault - Flowers will fight the charge.

Unbelievable, right? Yet why is it not surprising that this is E.W., Jackson's new BFF, a guy who - not joking here - "tied one end of a rope to [a girl's] waist...and the other to his van," then "every time she fell...she was dragged along a gravel road." Crazy, demented s***, not to mention completely against anything Jesus ever taught. But wait, you say, that was back in 2007, maybe the guy's gotten better since then? Uhhh...not so much.
There's More... :: (0 Comments, 384 words in story)

Time for VA to Toss Bob Marshall's Anti-LGBT Hate Amendment Into "ash heap of history"

by: lowkell

Tue May 20, 2014 at 15:33:56 PM EDT

Great news for equality in Pennsylvania, as these hateful and unAmerican constitutional amendments are struck down all across the country. Now, thanks in part to our superb Attorney General Mark Herring, it's almost time for Virginia to join Pennsylvania and so many other states. Sure, homophobic wacko Del. "Sideshow Bob" Marshall will be sad, as will others in his party, but that should just make the rest of us even happier! :)

P.S. I'm hoping the ruling will come back in a few weeks and will be 2-1 to strike down Virginia's anti-LGBT hate amendment.

Discuss :: (0 Comments)

Video: Mark Herring on "a moment in our history that should make Virginians proud"

by: lowkell

Tue May 13, 2014 at 15:27:43 PM EDT

Great stuff from Virginia Attorney General Mark Herring, who every day proves that: a) elections have major consequences; b) your vote REALLY matters; and c) what a huge difference there is between Republicans and Democrats when it comes to LGBT equality (and women's rights, the environment, you name it). Thank you Mark Herring, and keep up the great work!
Good morning and thank you for joining us this morning. I'm joined by the Solicitor General of Virginia, Stuart Raphael, who presented Virginia's case in court this morning.

The Commonwealth of Virginia enjoys a history as rich and complicated as any in our great nation. It is marked by moments of profound leadership on the national stage, but it also includes moments where elected officials, including Attorneys General, fought to protect an unjust status quo.

Today was a moment in our history that should make Virginians proud, as our commonwealth again takes the lead, this time, on one of the key civil rights issues of our time.

Today you heard the opponents of marriage equality make the best case they could, but just like in district court, their arguments were wholly unpersuasive. Nothing that was said in the court room today alters the basic incompatibility of this discriminatory ban with the protections guaranteed by our constitution. And every single federal court that has considered the question since last summer's Windsor decision has reached the same conclusion.

The constitution does not permit states laws to mark committed relationships between same-sex couples as deficient and inferior. As we have said repeatedly throughout this case, the issue is not the right to gay marriage or the right to straight marriage, it is just the right to marriage and all the responsibilities that come with it.

In her decision striking down the marriage ban, Judge Wright Allen said it well, invoking the Emancipation Proclamation: "The men and women, and the children too, whose voices join in noble harmony with Plaintiffs today, also ask for fairness, and fairness only. This, so far as it is in this Court's power, they and all others shall have."

There's More... :: (1 Comments, 378 words in story)
Next >>
Menu

Make a New Account

Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?


Advertising


FOLLOW BLUE VIRGINIA on SOCIAL MEDIA


Donate to Blue Virginia

About
The purpose of Blue Virginia is to cover Virginia politics from a progressive and Democratic perspective. This is a group blog and a community blog. We invite everyone to comment here, but please be aware that profanity, personal attacks, bigotry, insults, rudeness, frequent unsupported or off-point statements, "trolling" (NOTE: that includes outright lies, whether about climate science, or what other people said, or whatever), and "troll ratings abuse" (e.g., "troll" rating someone simply because you disagree with their argument) are not permitted and, if continued, will lead to banning. For more on trolling, see the Daily Kos FAQs. Also note that diaries may be deleted if they do not contain at least 2 solid paragraphs of original text; if not, please use the comments section of a relevant diary. For more on writing diaries, click here. Thanks, and enjoy!

P.S. You can contact us at lowell@raisingkaine.com and you can subscribe to Lowell's Twitter feed here. If you'd like to subscribe to Miles Grant's Twitter feed, click here. For Teacherken, click here. For Kindler, click here.

P.P.S. To see the Blue Virginia archive, please click here. To see the Raising Kaine archive, please click here. To see the Blue Commonwealth archive, please click here.



RSS Feed

Subscribe to Blue Virginia - Front Page


Powered by: SoapBlox