Advertising

Blog Roll
Who's My Legislator?

Virginia Blogs
Augusta Free Press
Bacon's Rebellion
Blue Ridge Caucus
Blue Louisa
Coarse Cracked Corn
Crew of 42
DemRulz
Dixie Pig
Equality Loudoun
Greater Greater Washington
Loudoun Progress
Moonhowlings
Not Larry Sabato
Ox Road South Blog
Pilot on Politics" blog
Richmonder
Richmond Sunlight
RTD Virginia Politics blog
Roanoke Times blog
Shad Plank
Vivian Paige
Waldo Jaquith
Waldo's VA Political Blogroll


Find more about Weather in Arlington, VA
Click for weather forecast
Search




Advanced Search


Is Bill Bolling Actually MORE "Conservative" than Ken Cuccinelli?!?

by: lowkell

Thu Nov 29, 2012 at 12:17:53 PM EST


The conventional wisdom, which I'd point out is almost always wrong, is that Ken Cuccinelli is much more "conservative" (in quotes because the word today has essentially lost all meaning; many of these self-proclaimed "conservatives" are actually far-right-wing extremists and radicals) than Bill Bolling. Is there any truth to that? Let's look at their interest group ratings, courtesy of Project Vote Smart, from when they were in the General Assembly.

Bill Bolling (looking at his last year in the State Senate, 2005, unless otherwise noted)
ZERO from NARAL Pro-Choice Virginia
ZERO from Planned Parenthood of Virginia
100% from the Virginia Chamber of Commerce
ZERO from Equality Virginia
100% from the Family Foundation of Virginia
ZERO from the Virginia League of Conservation Voters (although other years are all over the place)
11% Lifetime Rating from the Virginia AFL-CIO
ZERO from the Virginia National Organization for Women (2000 rating is the last available)
Also, the NRA said "Bolling's strong support of the Second Amendment has earned him an "A+" rating."

Ken Cuccinelli (looking at his last year in the State Senate, 2009, unless otherwise noted)
ZERO from NARAL Pro-Choice Virginia
ZERO from Planned Parenthood of Virginia
89% from Virginia FREE (note: Cuccinelli's last rating from the Virginia Chamber of Commerce was 82% in 2005)
67% from Equality Virginia
91% from the Family Foundation of Virginia
10% from the Virginia League of Conservation Voters (note: other years are all over the place)
ZERO from the Virginia AFL-CIO
A rating from the NRA

lowkell :: Is Bill Bolling Actually MORE "Conservative" than Ken Cuccinelli?!?

Comparing these ratings, it looks like Bill Bolling was actually a bit more right wing than Ken Cuccinelli while in the General Assembly in a number of areas (social issues, business), and about the same in other areas. So much for Bolling being more "moderate" in any way than Cuccinelli? Looking at their actual voting records, that sure seems to be the case.

So why does Cuccinelli get most of the attention, both positive (from the Tea Party, religious fundamentalists, etc.) and negative (from Democrats, liberals, progressives, etc.)? I'd argue it has almost nothing whatsoever to do with substance, but is pretty much 100% style/tone. Namely, Cuccinelli is flashy, aggressive, abrasive, insurgent/grassroots, loud and proud of the right-wingnuttiness he stands for; Bolling is boring, dull, drab, relatively genteel/establishment, and quiet about his own right-wingnuttiness. Other than that, I'm not seeing much daylight between the two. How about you?

P.S. Per a comment, it's also worth noting that Cuccinelli has been in a much stronger position to push his right-wingnut agenda as Virginia Attorney General than Bolling has been as the mostly powerless Lieutenant Governor.

Tags: , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email

You need to look at the Attorney General, not the Senator (0.00 / 0)
It is rather amateurish to ask "why Cuccinelli get[s] most of the attention" when you only look at his Senate record. As AG he has launched a crusade against UVA climate scientists, bullied the Board of Health into making new clinic standards retroactive to existing clinics, tried to bully the Board of Juvenile Justice into removing protections for LGBT youth, and issued a opinion that LGBT employment protections by State colleges and universities was "prohibit[ed]" by law. As AG, Mr. Cuccinelli has shown himself to be a right wing radical in every sense of the term.

But Those Aren't Articles Of Classic Conservatism (0.00 / 0)
Those are reactionary hot buttons that would shame a genuine conservative.

[ Parent ]
Very true, there's nothing traditionally "conservative" (0.00 / 0)
about what Cuccinelli's been doing on climate science, individual liberty (e.g., LGBT rights), and many other areas. A traditionally "conservative" AG would have been spending their time focused on fighting crime, cracking down on gangs, stuff like that.

Follow me on Twitter. Follow Blue Virginia on Facebook and Twitter.

[ Parent ]
Yes, I'm well aware of what Cuckoo's done as AG (0.00 / 0)
We've written hundreds of articles about his antics, and how he's a right-wing nutjob. The point of this piece is simply to point out that Bill Bolling isn't any less "conservative" than Cuccinelli, just that he has a different style, also hasn't been in the position to do as much damage as the Attorney General.

Follow me on Twitter. Follow Blue Virginia on Facebook and Twitter.

[ Parent ]
Cuccinelli conservative in the ugliest way (0.00 / 0)
Cuccinelli is conservative in the sense that he wants to take us back at least 100 years, or perhaps back to the Middle Ages when scientists were punished when they got out of line with Church doctrine.  

If one buys in any sense the concept of rational conservatism, from Edmund Burke to William F. Buckley to, say, David Brooks, then I don't see how he could be considered "conservative" -- particularly considering his aggressive and dictatorial use of state power to control everything from climate science to your sister's vagina.  Perhaps you could classify it as "barbarian conservatism".  

For a Sustainable Virginia. Now on Twitter.


Try to convince the corporate media to stop calling him (0.00 / 0)
"conservative" and starting calling him "radical extremist."  So far, they continue to push their false equivalence narrative, where Kookinelli is the "conservative" and [fill in the blank Democrat] by definition is the "liberal." It's totally false, and it's totally infuriating.

Follow me on Twitter. Follow Blue Virginia on Facebook and Twitter.

[ Parent ]
I think it's fair to say a majority of Virginians agree on this. (0.00 / 0)


Follow me on Twitter. Follow Blue Virginia on Facebook and Twitter.

[ Parent ]
Menu

Make a New Account

Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?


Advertising

FOLLOW BLUE VIRGINIA on SOCIAL MEDIA


Donate to Blue Virginia

About
The purpose of Blue Virginia is to cover Virginia politics from a progressive and Democratic perspective. This is a group blog and a community blog. We invite everyone to comment here, but please be aware that profanity, personal attacks, bigotry, insults, rudeness, frequent unsupported or off-point statements, "trolling" (NOTE: that includes outright lies, whether about climate science, or what other people said, or whatever), and "troll ratings abuse" (e.g., "troll" rating someone simply because you disagree with their argument) are not permitted and, if continued, will lead to banning. For more on trolling, see the Daily Kos FAQs. Also note that diaries may be deleted if they do not contain at least 2 solid paragraphs of original text; if not, please use the comments section of a relevant diary. For more on writing diaries, click here. Thanks, and enjoy!

P.S. You can contact us at lowell@raisingkaine.com and you can subscribe to Lowell's Twitter feed here. If you'd like to subscribe to Miles Grant's Twitter feed, click here. For Teacherken, click here. For Kindler, click here.

P.P.S. To see the Blue Virginia archive, please click here. To see the Raising Kaine archive, please click here. To see the Blue Commonwealth archive, please click here.



RSS Feed

Subscribe to Blue Virginia - Front Page


Real Time Web Analytics
Powered by: SoapBlox