Advertising

Blog Roll
Who's My Legislator?

Virginia Blogs
Augusta Free Press
Bacon's Rebellion
Blue Ridge Caucus
Blue Louisa
Coarse Cracked Corn
Crew of 42
DemRulz
Dixie Pig
Equality Loudoun
Greater Greater Washington
Loudoun Progress
Moonhowlings
Ox Road South Blog
Pilot on Politics" blog
Richmonder
Richmond Sunlight
RTD Virginia Politics blog
Roanoke Times blog
Shad Plank
Vivian Paige
Waldo Jaquith


Find more about Weather in Arlington, VA
Click for weather forecast
Search




Advanced Search


Endorsement: Aneesh Chopra for Lieutenant Governor

by: lowkell

Sun Apr 07, 2013 at 20:00:32 PM EDT


Before I start, I just want to make clear that this is my own, personal endorsement, based on my own, independent observations and analysis of the Virginia Democratic primary for Lieutenant Governor, my own interviews of the candidates, etc. With that, here's my reasoning for endorsing Aneesh Chopra for the 2013 Democratic nomination for Lieutenant Governor of Virginia.

1. I interviewed both Aneesh Chopra and Ralph Northam. Both candidates did well, and I enjoyed talking to them both, so it is not a "negative" in any way against Ralph Northam that I was highly impressed with Aneesh, both in terms of being a strong Democrat, but also in terms of his detailed knowledge of the issues facing Virginia. That was an area, honestly, where I had some doubts, given that Aneesh had never served in the Virginia General Assembly. That's one of the reasons why I decided to ask him where he stood on a wide range of legislation that was being debated in the General Assembly at the time. His answers were excellent, but as I wrote at the time, "What I found most impressive here was that Aneesh - who isn't a member of the General Assembly - was familiar with every bill I mentioned, didn't even need me to read a full description before he answered immediately 'yea' or 'nay.'" Very impressive. Also highly encouraging was that the answers were all "correct" from a progressive, Democratic perspective, again without any hesitation on any of them, and without any prompting of any kind. Again, very impressive.

2. To date, I've been highly impressed with the Chopra campaign, pretty much in every way - management (a very well-run campaign), fundraising (he's kicked butt on this front), social media (he's used it in creative and effective ways), field, etc. In contrast, the Northam campaign has been...well let's just say a bit shaky. After getting off to a late start (Sen. Northam initially wasn't planning to run, then changed his mind and decided to do so), the Northam campaign's been significantly outraised - and I'd argue outhustled - by the Chopra campaign. I also hear they just fired all their field staff, they're on their second campaign manager in a couple months, and let's just say I've heard other stories about the state of the Northam campaign the past couple months that don't give me a warm and fuzzy feeling. Bottom line: given that we want the strongest candidate to go up against the Republicans this summer and fall, to me the quality of the campaigns is a significant reason in and of itself to endorse Aneesh Chopra over Ralph Northam for the nomination. (Note: for more on this topic, see the astute Virginia Democrat/political strategist Danny Barefoot's endorsement of Aneesh here, particularly paragraphs 3-6).

lowkell :: Endorsement: Aneesh Chopra for Lieutenant Governor
3. Clearly, one of the keys to Democrats winning this November will be changing the electorate from a typical odd-year/off-year Virginia electorate (skews older, whiter, and more Republican). To do that, we need candidates who first and foremost understand the importance of changing the electorate more towards the "Obama coalition." Aneesh Chopra clearly "gets it" on that front. As he said in our interview, "the formula is clear" - we need to turn out the coalition that came out for President Obama and Tim Kaine in 2012. Why he feels he can do that is because: a) as he says, "I reflect the values of the 2012 coalition that reelected President Obama;" b) he understands that "it's also about smarter campaigning, as we did in 2012," including the use of new media and today's cutting-edge communications tools and technology (note: Aneesh is an expert at this stuff) to reach voters; and c) because he believes Obama voters need to see a candidate who reflects their values, and he believes (and I tend to agree) that he is that person.

4. Both candidates are qualified for the job, they'll just bring different skill sets and emphases to it. In Aneesh's case, he served in the Kaine Administration (as Secretary of Technology) and in the Obama Administration (as the country's first Chief Technology Officer). He wasn't just a "techie," though, in the sense of only caring about tech for tech's sake. Instead, Aneesh employed technological tools for the purpose of improving people's lives. For instance, at a time when equal pay for equal work legislation appeared stalled out in Congress, Aneesh worked with Labor Secretary Hilda Solis to help open up salary data and make it easily accessible, so that women anywhere in the country who felt they were being paid less than a man for the same type of job could have the information they needed to challenge that unfairness. Aneesh also worked to make it easier for firefighters, police officers, and other first responders to communicate with each other over the same frequency; not something that was necessarily a simple matter. I could also see Aneesh's skills coming in handy with regard to setting up health care exchanges in Virginia, or perhaps in something like electronic health care records. The point is, technology is powerful if used to help improve people's lives, and Aneesh Chopra not only understands that, he's an expert in making it happen. I find that exciting.

5. The last point is somewhat of a "ding" at Sen. Northam, but I was not at all pleased with his February 21 appearance on the John Fredericks Show. First, note that John Fredericks is a diehard Republican, very conservative, planning to vote in the Virginia Republican convention, etc. So, the first thing that struck me was at about 38 minutes in. Fredericks went out of his way to praise Northam as "moderate" and "centrist," which is not in and of itself a problem, but he followed that up by contrasting Northam to what he (bizarrely) called the "far-left-wing candidate," Aneesh Chopra. Of course, that's utterly absurd Republican framing of Democrats in general - we're all "far left wing" supposedly. As for the LG primary, to date, I haven't heard of a single policy difference between Sen. Northam and Chopra, so who knows what Fredericks was saying, but for sure he was completely wrong. The problem is, Sen. Northam not only didn't push back against that absurd characterization of a good, mainstream Democrat, but he said "I appreciate that question." Ugh. Making matters worse, at around 42:40, Fredericks talked about how "really fired up" he was to vote in the Republican convention on May 18, and then just a few weeks later how he - and "Republicans like me" - were going to vote AGAIN in the June 11 Democratic primary. Clearly, that's legal, but it's totally not cool for a diehard Republican who is 99.999999999% likely to vote straight Republican in November to be messing with the Democratic Party's primary. And a Democratic candidate for statewide office should say exactly that. Instead, Sen. Northam's response was...well, I'll just quote it verbatim and let you decide what you think:

Northam: "That's great John, you know what, I look forward to it. If you want, I will come up and pick you up and I'll take you to the polls. I think it would be a good day for both of us..."

Fredericks: "I'm going to take you up on that...Ralph Northam going to pick me up and my family, right?"

Northam: "That's right, yes I will, we can have a van, bus, whatever you need, we'll come get you."

Fredericks: "I'm going to vote in the Democratic primary, I'm getting picked up, my whole family on June 11 by Dr. Northam; we're going to take pictures, put it on the internet, I'm so excited I'm beside myself."

Blech.

So, what's the answer a Democratic candidate should give? How about, "You know, John, I welcome any Virginian who believes in moving our state forward, who opposes Ken Cuccinelli's extreme/divisive agenda, and who is sincerely open to voting Democratic this November, to come vote in our primary. If not, I'd say that they should stick to the Republican convention and not interfere with our process of selecting our party's nominee."

Anyway, I don't want to end this on a negative note, as my endorsement of Aneesh Chopra is overwhelmingly a positive one, FOR Aneesh, and would have happened even without item #5 above, for all the reasons I've discussed. In sum, if you want a dynamic candidate who can help bring out the "Obama coalition" voters, who will bring a unique and impressive skillset to the Lieutenant Governor's office, who strongly believes in moving Virginia forward, and who has been running a top-notch campaign during the primary that will carry over into the general election campaign, then I encourage you to vote for Aneesh Chopra on June 11. Thanks, and go Aneesh!

Tags: , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email

Agree (4.00 / 1)
I agree with most of what you have stated. Northam is a fine "usual" Democratic candidate. Chopra represents the future of the party. It's time for us to go with a candidate who knows how to energize the new "Obama" coalition. That coalition is real.

Reason #5 (0.00 / 0)
I think it is fair to say that Virginia has two qualified candidates running for LG this year. However, the 5th point or the "ding" at Senator Northam is unnecessary and irrelevant. I have listened to the John Fredricks Show interview several times and it is clear that that Sen. Northam was just having a light hearted back and forth with the host. It is very easy to say "this is the correct answer the candidate should give." I agree that voting across party lines for primaries is ridiculous but I cannot recall a politician ever telling someone not to vote for them.

To endorse Annesh Chopra is one thing, but to include a statement like "let's just say I've heard other stories about the state of the Northam campaign" is uncalled for and poor writing. If you are not going to inform the reader of these stories (rumors) I believe it best to not mention it at all.

Your reasoning behind endorsing Aneesh Chopra is clear. He is a charismatic, bright candidate and would make an excellent LG. I think it possible to say this without taking shots at the Northam campaign and nitpicking a radio interview with a Conservative talk show host.    


That thought crossed my mind, but... (4.00 / 1)
...I rejected it, because of the tone of the entire interview, which I'd characterize as a veritable love fest between Fredericks and Northam. I particularly didn't like the comments by Fredericks about how Northam's the "moderate" candidate while Aneesh is the "far-left-wing candidate," and that Northam said he appreciated the question (and didn't refute it in any way). Bottom line: I want Democratic candidates who don't put up with Republican disinformation and distortion, let alone say they "appreciate" the question and encourage them to mess with our primary.

Follow me on Twitter. Follow Blue Virginia on Facebook and Twitter.

[ Parent ]
Should be a word . . . (0.00 / 0)
For the creation of new Blue Virginia accounts just to comment on endorsements.

[ Parent ]
I usually just... (0.00 / 0)
read and don't comment but the nature of the endorsement rubbed me the wrong way.  

[ Parent ]
So.... (0.00 / 0)
...I write an endorsement of Aneesh that's overwhelmingly positive, with two "dings" at Northam (his campaign's dysfunction and his love fest with right-wing radio talk show host Jeff Fredericks), and it rubs you the wrong way? I'm curious, who are you supporting for LG and what is your rationale exactly? More broadly, when you support one candidate over another, is it always 100% positive FOR the candidate you support, and ZERO percent negative AGAINST the candidate you oppose? If so, you may be the only person in America who that can be said about. ;)

Follow me on Twitter. Follow Blue Virginia on Facebook and Twitter.

[ Parent ]
I disagree mainly on Women's issues (4.00 / 1)
I have to say I have not heard/read anything about Chopra's stand on many issues impacting women. I have heard Dr. Northam speak out many times supporting a woman's right to choose, against vaginal ultrasound, etc.

I think the woman's vote will be crucial and Dr. Northam has what it takes to capture that vote.


His statement opposing McDonnell's amendment was pretty good. (0.00 / 0)
Here.

FWIW.

Cheers,
Scott.


[ Parent ]
Aneesh is a very promising candidate (0.00 / 0)
In one respect, he reminds me of Jim Webb early in his campaign -- a thoughtful intellectual, not a professional politician, learning the rules of the game as he goes.  I remember Chap teaching Webb how to shake hands at a parade -- whereas for Aneesh, the challenge is more how to boil all his knowledge and ideas into a concise message for distribution across the Commonwealth.

In most ways, though, he is sort of an opposite mirror image -- whereas Webb represented an important link to Old Virginny, Aneesh represents the New Dominion -- where, as you and he point out, he is well positioned to attract the rising constituencies of minorities and young people. And whereas Webb always disdained politics, I see in Aneesh a lot of energy and enthusiasm to learn, grow and adapt.  

I think he has a core philosophy of smarter, tech-savvy government which makes much sense -- and should to centrist voters as well.  For this reason, I really can't understand the "far left wing" nonsense.  I wonder if Fredericks is just applying a stereotype because Aneesh is non-white, NOVA-based, and has worked with Obama: clear signs of a Kenyan-born socialist!

For a Sustainable Virginia. Now on Twitter.


On that last point.... (0.00 / 0)
...I've been trying to think of another explanation, just as I keep trying to think of one for right-winger's Obama Derangement Syndrome, and I'm not coming up with anything else. Other theories?

Follow me on Twitter. Follow Blue Virginia on Facebook and Twitter.

[ Parent ]
Menu

Make a New Account

Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?


Advertising

FOLLOW BLUE VIRGINIA on SOCIAL MEDIA


Donate to Blue Virginia

About
The purpose of Blue Virginia is to cover Virginia politics from a progressive and Democratic perspective. This is a group blog and a community blog. We invite everyone to comment here, but please be aware that profanity, personal attacks, bigotry, insults, rudeness, frequent unsupported or off-point statements, "trolling" (NOTE: that includes outright lies, whether about climate science, or what other people said, or whatever), and "troll ratings abuse" (e.g., "troll" rating someone simply because you disagree with their argument) are not permitted and, if continued, will lead to banning. For more on trolling, see the Daily Kos FAQs. Also note that diaries may be deleted if they do not contain at least 2 solid paragraphs of original text; if not, please use the comments section of a relevant diary. For more on writing diaries, click here. Thanks, and enjoy!

P.S. You can contact us at lowell@raisingkaine.com and you can subscribe to Lowell's Twitter feed here. If you'd like to subscribe to Miles Grant's Twitter feed, click here. For Teacherken, click here. For Kindler, click here.

P.P.S. To see the Blue Virginia archive, please click here. To see the Raising Kaine archive, please click here. To see the Blue Commonwealth archive, please click here.



RSS Feed

Subscribe to Blue Virginia - Front Page


Real Time Web Analytics
Powered by: SoapBlox