Advertising

Blog Roll
Who's My Legislator?

Virginia Blogs
Augusta Free Press
Bacon's Rebellion
Blue Ridge Caucus
Blue Louisa
Coarse Cracked Corn
Crew of 42
DemRulz
Dixie Pig
Equality Loudoun
Greater Greater Washington
Loudoun Progress
Moonhowlings
Not Larry Sabato
Ox Road South Blog
Pilot on Politics" blog
Richmonder
Richmond Sunlight
RTD Virginia Politics blog
Roanoke Times blog
Shad Plank
Vivian Paige
Waldo Jaquith
Waldo's VA Political Blogroll


Find more about Weather in Arlington, VA
Click for weather forecast
Search




Advanced Search


Why McDonnell is Baffled by Bolling and Cuccinelli

by: Goldmanusa

Mon Feb 18, 2013 at 11:09:17 AM EST


by Paul Goldman

Governor McDonnell can't understand why those Republicans who want his job aren't focusing on the number 100%. Okay, that's really a ratio, based on two rounded-off numbers: $3.60 as the numerator and $1.80 as the denominator. $1.80 and $3.60. But to be more precise, the Governor's view of the Bolling vs Cuccinelli vs McAuliffe three-ring circus is being shaped by four data points: $1,400, 800, $2.20, $1,100.

At this time in Governor Warner's last year, the average price of a gallon of gas at the pump rang the register at around $1.85. Today, according to national statistics, it is currently about $3.60. That's a nearly 100% increase. You got it: The average swing voter knows he or she is paying a $1.75 a gallon MORE for gasoline.

According to national statistics, after you do what political strategy folks are suppose to do, it turns out the far more potent political statistic is $1,400 MORE. Why? If you shift through the various studies, it seems fair to conclude the average swing voter in a Virginia election - a middle aged worker with a used car who has to sit in traffic at times to get to work and when trying to have some fun - uses about 800 gallons of refined black gold a year. When you multiply $1.75 X 800, you get how much a year the average swing voter is paying for gasoline at the pump. It therefore costs $1,400 a year more to fill the tank of the average swing voter.

However: I concede this not very sophisticated of me, just my high school and junior college education talking. Truth is though, I never ran into a swing voter who asked me about nominal vs. inflation adjusted energy prices. Sorry therefore to spend so much time on Main Street. On the blogs, editorial boards, opinion columns, graduate school seminars, it's different: they use the real inflation adjusted numbers, got to show something for all the money spent on graduate school.

OKAY: You got me. Forgive an old dog his trespasses. I should use inflation adjusted dollars, how unsophisticated can a guy be right? So I went to the U. S. Bureau of Labor Statistics website. They have a calculator to help us retro types understand 2013 political analysis. It produces an inflation-adjusted price of a gallon of gas at the start of this year at roughly $2.20. This means, in real terms, $1,000 is a fair estimate of the expected extra annual cost in constant dollars for a swing voter to fuel up his or her vehicle this year.

But of course, the real PhD in campaigning realizes the truly powerful number, is this one: What percentage of previously disposal income is now gone down the gas tank for the average swing voter?  So let me sum it up in grade school political language: The average swing voter is hopping, jumping, freaking, kick the gas pump mad when filling up the tank. They ain't thinking constant dollars, or any of the policy wonk psycho babble. If they have a 15-gallon gas tank, they have to pay an extra near 30 bucks to fill up. If they have a 20 gallon tank, they have to pay nearly $35 more at today's prices. The price of gas could be $4.00 per gallon at election time.  

So McDonnell is thinking: Why would anyone who has ever run a winning statewide campaign in Virginia, or played any major role in developing the strategy, believe 2013 is the election year to go to the voters with the proud boost that you did them a favor by forcing them to pay a RECORD GAS TAX INCREASE on top of the $1,400, on top of the new tolls in Tidewater, need I go on?

The answer: No one would. No one could with any political sense. Thus, when Bill Bolling jumped ship on the governor and went from supporting the total elimination of the gas tax to supporting a RECORD GAS TAX INCREASE, Mr. McDonnell decided his LG had lost his political mind, seduced by the editorial writers and others calling him the "moderate" hope of the GOP. The governor never figured Bolling would be so easily manipulated. He was wrong.

He knows Cuccinelli is a hard case. Thus McDonnell always figured McAuliffe would be the first to back his idea of shutting down the gas tax and moving toward a sales tax for transportation, an idea he actually took from the Democrats in the first place! But the governor soon realized this might be too tricky until Senator Saslaw had at least had a chance to negotiate. Terry is a loyal guy.  

Leaving then, as the governor saw it: A lay-up for Cuccinelli. The Governor waited and waited. But Cuccinelli refused.

Then the AG shocked the governor by backing the GOP Senate plan. It was DOA once people realized it had no political, must less transportation, appeal. It raised less money, yet was called a tax increase by GOP anti-taxers, kept a user fee on gas, and hiked the sales tax de facto on internet sales. It offended everyone.

So now the ball sits next to the basket, a lay-up for the first candidate for governor who picks it up and declares: I WILL NOT SUPPORT A RECORD GAS TAX INCREASE. It is the only surefire winner right now.

There is no chance that Governor McDonnell is going to support a RECORD GAS TAX INCREASE if it manages to get out of the House of Delegates.

He can add: all the way up to $1400, $1,100, whatever number who think is the most accurate. Why would any sensible political advisor tell his or her candidate to leave themselves open to the charge of raising the price of gas, meaning you could get blamed for the whole mess?

Based on the governor's rhetoric, I believe it will be difficult for him to agree to any increase in the gas tax based on his claim it would raise the price of gas.  But the size demanded by the Senate Bill and Mr. Bolling is NOT GOING TO HAPPEN. So I understand why the Governor is baffled by the not-ready-for-prime time campaigns of fellow Republicans Bolling and Cuccinelli.

If McDonnell were running for governor, he would have long ago denounced a RECORD GAS TAX INCREASE  and promised never to back it.

Goldmanusa :: Why McDonnell is Baffled by Bolling and Cuccinelli
Tags: (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email

I agree with the Virginia Senate Dems on this one (0.00 / 0)
Va. Senate Democrats Have Compromised on Transportation. Now, it's the Republicans' Turn.

On general fund revenue, sales tax, and online sales tax,
Democrats have moved towards the Governor's plan

RICHMOND, VA - After making serious concessions regarding transportation funding, Virginia Senate Democrats urge their Republican colleagues to compromise.    

On three key demands -- made by Governor McDonnell, House Republicans, and many Senate Republicans -- Senate Democrats have given ground, showing a willingness to work towards a bipartisan transportation compromise. In his original proposal, Governor McDonnell moved existing general fund money to transportation, diverted future online sales tax revenue to transportation, and increased the sales tax.  After stating they would not support a transportation plan that had these components, Senate Democrats unanimously voted for a plan that incorporated these ideas.    

The transportation plan that Senate Democrats voted for contains many aspects of Governor McDonnell's and the House Republicans' proposals. The plan includes a redirection of approximately $56 million of existing general fund money, and includes a significant redirection of future online sales tax revenue. The bill also incorporates the Governor's idea of using sales tax revenue by allowing localities to impose a local sales tax to fund transportation projects, despite deep concern among Democrats regarding the uncoupling of road users from road financing.

Senator Richard L. Saslaw (D-Fairfax) said, "We have moved a long way from our original position and made very significant moves toward the Governor's plan. We've given them general fund money, sales tax money and online tax revenue they say is essential to any bill they can support. Senate Democrats have compromised. Now, it's time for those on the other side of the aisle to come towards us."

Senator Janet D. Howell (D-Fairfax) said, "Virginia ranks 38th in public school spending, 35th in higher education spending, and worst of all, 46th in Medicaid spending. Money in Virginia is so tight that every penny is needed just to fund our existing commitments to children, the sick and elderly, and the very poor. If we take even more money out of the general fund to pay for transportation, then our ability to fund public education and take care of our most vulnerable Virginians will suffer even more."



Follow me on Twitter. Follow Blue Virginia on Facebook and Twitter.

Menu

Make a New Account

Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?


Advertising

FOLLOW BLUE VIRGINIA on SOCIAL MEDIA


Donate to Blue Virginia

About
The purpose of Blue Virginia is to cover Virginia politics from a progressive and Democratic perspective. This is a group blog and a community blog. We invite everyone to comment here, but please be aware that profanity, personal attacks, bigotry, insults, rudeness, frequent unsupported or off-point statements, "trolling" (NOTE: that includes outright lies, whether about climate science, or what other people said, or whatever), and "troll ratings abuse" (e.g., "troll" rating someone simply because you disagree with their argument) are not permitted and, if continued, will lead to banning. For more on trolling, see the Daily Kos FAQs. Also note that diaries may be deleted if they do not contain at least 2 solid paragraphs of original text; if not, please use the comments section of a relevant diary. For more on writing diaries, click here. Thanks, and enjoy!

P.S. You can contact us at lowell@raisingkaine.com and you can subscribe to Lowell's Twitter feed here. If you'd like to subscribe to Miles Grant's Twitter feed, click here. For Teacherken, click here. For Kindler, click here.

P.P.S. To see the Blue Virginia archive, please click here. To see the Raising Kaine archive, please click here. To see the Blue Commonwealth archive, please click here.



RSS Feed

Subscribe to Blue Virginia - Front Page


Real Time Web Analytics
Powered by: SoapBlox