Does Sen. Mark Warner read Ezra Klein, who recently noted that "Social Security taxes don't apply to income over $110,000?" Maybe, maybe not. But Warner does seem to be coming around to Klein's position on the issue, based on an answer Warner just provided to my question on his #askwarner Twitter townhall.
My question: "Before even considering cuts to Soc. Security or Medicare, will you support raising the $110,000 income cap subject to taxation?"
Warner's answer: "@lowkell I think raising the cap has to be part of any SS reform."
I checked around, including OnTheIssues, and it appears that Tim Kaine supports lifting the payroll tax cap, but that Mark Warner had, at least until now, had "No stance on record" on this issue. In contrast, Warner has said he supports raising the retirement age for Social Security, which is what Ezra Klein talks about in his column, noting the Congressional Budget Office finding that making "all income subject to payroll taxes...would do three times as much to solve Social Security's shortfall as raising the retirement age to 70." Let's hope Sen. Warner reaches the same conclusion as Ezra Klein, and the CBO, have.
The purpose of Blue Virginia is to cover Virginia politics from a progressive and Democratic perspective. This is a group blog and a community blog. We invite everyone to comment here, but please be aware that profanity, personal attacks, bigotry, insults, rudeness, frequent unsupported or off-point statements, "trolling" (NOTE: that includes outright lies, whether about climate science, or what other people said, or whatever), and "troll ratings abuse" (e.g., "troll" rating someone simply because you disagree with their argument) are not permitted and, if continued, will lead to banning. For more on trolling, see the Daily Kos FAQs. Also note that diaries may be deleted if they do not contain at least 2 solid paragraphs of original text; if not, please use the comments section of a relevant diary. For more on writing diaries, click here. Thanks, and enjoy!