Blog Roll
Who's My Legislator?

Virginia Blogs
All Things Education
Augusta Free Press
Crew of 42
Dixie Pig
Greater Greater Washington
Loudoun Progress
Ox Road South Blog
Pilot on Politics" blog
Power for the People
Richmond Sunlight
RVA Politics
Shad Plank
Vivian Paige

Find more about Weather in Arlington, VA
Click for weather forecast

Advanced Search

Let's End Gerrymandering Now

by: AndySchmooklerforCongress

Thu Nov 15, 2012 at 21:37:54 PM EST

( - promoted by lowkell)

On November 6, Virginia's presidential vote went to the Democratic candidate, Barack Obama, by about 4 percentage points.  The Senate seat went to the Democratic candidate, Tim Kaine, by almost 6 percent.  At the same time, in the eleven congressional races, all of the incumbents won-eight Republicans and three Democrats.  

Does that mean that huge numbers of Virginians were splitting their votes?  Not really.  Nearly six percent more Virginians voted for Democrats in the races for the House of Representatives than voted for Republicans.

How can it be that with less than half of the votes the Republicans won more than two-thirds of the House seats?

A big part of the answer can be given in one word:  gerrymandering.  That's the process by which politicians and political parties draw district boundaries in order to achieve the results that they want.

Those boundaries are redrawn every ten years, after each Census, by state legislatures.  The election of 2010 was a huge win for the Republicans in the states, as well as nationally. In most of the nation, redistricting was tilted to help elect Republicans.

And it worked.  What happened in the Virginia congressional races happened nationally as well.  The Republicans will retain a sizeable majority in the House of Representatives - 233 to 195 (with seven still in doubt)-even though nationwide, Democratic candidates received a half million more votes than their Republican opponents. (Republicans claim that they won some sort of "mandate" by winning a majority of seats in the House, but you can have no mandate if a majority of the people voted against you.)

AndySchmooklerforCongress :: Let's End Gerrymandering Now
And yet gerrymandering is not a partisan issue.  Politicians of America's major parties have been doing this for two centuries, Democrats as well as Republicans. Ultimately, gerrymandering is not so much about one political party doing wrong to the other, but about the political class doing wrong to the American people.

Politicians gerrymander in order to gain more power.  Power is a zero-sum game, meaning that one player can gain only if another loses.  The power that the politicians and parties gain is power that the people lose.

People lose power because districts are made non-competitive. As has been said before, elected officials determine their voters rather than vice-versa. The result is less choice for the people, and often politicians who stay in office for decades.

It's time to put an end to gerrymandering.  

In the 21st century, it would be easy to take the politics out of redistricting.  A computer using one algorithm for each of the states could crank out a set of boundaries that plays no favorites. (Begin in a specified corner for each state - e.g. the southwest-and proceed precinct by precinct by set rules until the necessary numbers of people are contained and then draw the boundary, and proceed to draw the next.)

The power taken from the political class would be returned to the people, for whom our whole system of government was established.

The House was the part of government that our founders wanted to be most responsive to the people.  That's why everyone in the House of Representatives must go back to the people every two years.  And yet the House is the one part of our national system where power can be stolen from the people by gerrymandering. You can't gerrymander a Senate seat, because the Senate is statewide and there's no redistricting to do.  You can't gerrymander the presidential race, because that's nationwide, and governed by electoral votes cast state-by-state.

But the congressional districts get redrawn every ten years, and that creates a vulnerability in our democracy.

It's time to close off that opening for corruption.  Let's do it now when no one knows who will benefit and who will lose from having an honest system in 2021, when it's time to redistrict again.

Although we can't predict now whether this improvement in our democracy will benefit Democrats or Republicans, we do know that it will benefit the people of the United States.


Andy Schmookler, formerly a candidate for Congress, is the author of, among other books, the award-winning The Parable of the Tribes: The Problem of Power in Social Evolution.  He lives in Shenandoah County, Virginia.

Tags: , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email

I guess the obvious question would be (0.00 / 0)
How do you change and / or make law removing the bias legislature of the states from the process?

Can this be at a national level or do we have to change it state by state?

multi-member districts is the best way forward (0.00 / 0)
See Rob Richie's long opinion piece today in the Washington Post.

State-by-state redistricting procedures (0.00 / 0)
State-by-state redistricting procedures
1 Commission-based redistricting
2 Legislative-based redistricting
3 Hybrid method redistricting

State-by-state redistricting procedures involve the redrawing of boundary lines for state legislative and U.S. Congressional districts. Each state lets the Legislature or an independent commission draw the new boundaries after a decennial Census. Some states may use a combination of both methods depending on how the law is set.

Redistricting Types by State
Legislative = 28
Commission  = 9
Hybrid = 13

Commission-based redistricting

The following states give an independent commission the primary responsibility of drawing legislative and congressional boundaries. Members are usually selected by a state's Governor or by another elected official. Other officials that usually appoint individuals to redistricting commissions are not limited to Secretaries of State, leaders of the Legislature, and State Supreme Court justices.

Alaska, Arizona, California, Hawaii, Idaho, Missouri, Montana, New Jersey, and Washington.

Legislative-based redistricting

Most states require the Governor to approve the redistricting plans. Most states give the Governor the power to veto any redistricting plan introduced by the Legislature for any reason.

Alabama, Delaware, Florida, Georgia, Indiana, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, Nebraska, New Hampshire, New Mexico, Nevada, North Carolina, North Dakota, Oregon, Rhode Island, South Carolina, South Dakota, Tennessee, Utah, Virginia, West Virginia, Wisconsin, Wyoming

Hybrid method redistricting

A hybrid method of redistricting involves more than one government branch or agency working together to draw Congressional and Legislative boundaries. For example, the Legislature and a Advisory Commission can be charged to draw the boundaries. Some states consider the commissions an advisory board in which they only advise the Legislature.

Arkansas, Colorado, Connecticut, Illinois, Iowa, Maine, Mississippi, New York, Ohio, Oklahoma, Pennsylvania, Texas, Vermont

See also
State Legislative and Congressional Redistricting after the 2010 Census

Graphic showing ratio of Republicans to Democrats needed to elect rep (0.00 / 0)
Ratio of Republicans to Democrats needed to elect a House member

In Virginia, it takes about 2 1/2 people to elect a Democratic Congressman to ever 1 person it takes to elect a Republican.

Supportive Chart:
Share of House Seats won by each party in 2012 to the popular vote

Americans didn't intend to elect a Republican majority to the House of Representatives. Thanks to GOP-engineered redistricting, they did.



Make a New Account



Forget your username or password?



Donate to Blue Virginia

The purpose of Blue Virginia is to cover Virginia politics from a progressive and Democratic perspective. This is a group blog and a community blog. We invite everyone to comment here, but please be aware that profanity, personal attacks, bigotry, insults, rudeness, frequent unsupported or off-point statements, "trolling" (NOTE: that includes outright lies, whether about climate science, or what other people said, or whatever), and "troll ratings abuse" (e.g., "troll" rating someone simply because you disagree with their argument) are not permitted and, if continued, will lead to banning. For more on trolling, see the Daily Kos FAQs. Also note that diaries may be deleted if they do not contain at least 2 solid paragraphs of original text; if not, please use the comments section of a relevant diary. For more on writing diaries, click here. Thanks, and enjoy!

P.S. You can contact us at and you can subscribe to Lowell's Twitter feed here. If you'd like to subscribe to Miles Grant's Twitter feed, click here. For Teacherken, click here. For Kindler, click here.

P.P.S. To see the Blue Virginia archive, please click here. To see the Raising Kaine archive, please click here. To see the Blue Commonwealth archive, please click here.

RSS Feed

Subscribe to Blue Virginia - Front Page

Powered by: SoapBlox