Advertising

Blog Roll
Who's My Legislator?

Virginia Blogs
Augusta Free Press
Bacon's Rebellion
Blue Ridge Caucus
Blue Louisa
Coarse Cracked Corn
Crew of 42
DemRulz
Dixie Pig
Equality Loudoun
Greater Greater Washington
Loudoun Progress
Moonhowlings
Not Larry Sabato
Ox Road South Blog
Pilot on Politics" blog
Richmonder
Richmond Sunlight
RTD Virginia Politics blog
Roanoke Times blog
Shad Plank
Vivian Paige
Waldo Jaquith
Waldo's VA Political Blogroll


Find more about Weather in Arlington, VA
Click for weather forecast
Search




Advanced Search


An Ant's Grassroots View of the DPVA Convention in Fairfax

by: Teddy Goodson

Wed Jun 06, 2012 at 00:34:46 AM EDT


Being a lowly worker ant, crawling around the roots and looking up long (often untrimmed) blades of grass while struggling through the weeds, I hereby offer my observations and parse out a lesson or two of the 2012 DPVA Convention. Keep in mind, please, I was not privy to the thoughts or intentions of the leadership or any candidate, nor did I personally see everything that happened, only overt actions and results, which I used to produce the following political analysis. Before you crucify me, read the whole thing, eh?

VENUE, ADMINISTRATION, CONDUCT OF MEETING:  I've been told the convention was held in Northern Virginia at the urging of at least one prominent Congressional staff person with extensive roots in NoVa, and was originally planned for the Patriot Center at George Mason University. When it became evident that DPVA could not fill the Center, the event was moved to the University's Center for the Arts, because no one wanted DPVA's convention to look like the Romney rally in an empty stadium. This cost the DPVA a massive cancellation fee, which still resides in the hands of GMU and can supposedly be used as a "credit" by DPVA for some future event; rather than, say, cash on hand for candidate recruitment and campaigns.

The Center for the Arts was about the right size, and has good sound, but suffers from not having a center aisle for ease of getting to one's seat, distributing such things as ballots, or even evacuating at intermissions or during emergencies. The Center was made available to the DPVA only until 2 PM, which meant that the Convention had to marshal and conduct its business in 5 hours, 9 AM to 2 PM. This included organizing itself from scratch and voting - not only on resolutions but also on presidential electors and delegates to the national convention. In addition, those 5 hours included eating lunch and listening to speeches by a long list of prominent officials and other persons of repute, not to mention necessary repeated roll calls and personal potty breaks.  Obviously, the Chair of the meeting, who is the Chair of DPVA, had to run a taut ship and everything had to go expeditiously for this to work. Unfortunately, the Chair called us to order 15 minutes late, so we were behind the power curve from minute one.

Teddy Goodson :: An Ant's Grassroots View of the DPVA Convention in Fairfax
The long list of speakers included (but "not limited to") Terry McAuliffe, Gerry Connolly, Jim Moran, Tim Kaine... and I ask you, how could anyone expect such a stable of Irish politicians to be, er, short-winded?  Most of the morning was consumed with getting organized. That included the pro-forma election of standing committees (something of a joke IMO, since it was all pre-ordained and presented without discussion to the otherwise clueless average delegate to be rubber-stamped). We also listened to welcomes from local jurisdictions like the Democratic Chair of the Board of Supervisors of Fairfax County and the Democratic but non-partisan mayor-elect of Fairfax City, and remarks from the Legislative Black Caucus, the House Democratic Caucus, and the Senate Democratic Caucus, followed by Terry McAuliffe, who was greeted with shouts of "Run, Terry Run!" from the audience, many of whom sported stickers with the same message.

Meanwhile, because of some unexplained glitch, the election of Presidential Electors and DNC members was delayed, as were any short campaign speeches by the DNC candidates, so the elected officials, who were piling up in the wings, ready to make their remarks, were moved up to the speaker's rostrum in a long line. Now, I am not saying these venerable war horses did not make good, even inspiring speeches that were well received, but time was a-wastin' and it was well past noon. At that point, we had yet to get to the meaty purpose of the whole convocation.

By now it was clear to me, having run plenty of meetings myself, that the Chair had little or no control over his meeting, and was simply winging it. Delegates wandered in and out of the hall, crawling politely over those still in their seats in order to visit rest rooms or line up to collect their previously paid-for box lunches from the Black Caucus (it was good chow, by the way).

Finally, before voting on the DNC members, another roll call was conducted, the manner of which was for the Chair of each Congressional District to walk up the outside aisle and count down each row ("the last member of the 11th CD please raise your hand!") and then report the totals. These totals determined how many ballots were laboriously counted out to each Chair, who then distributed them one by one to be passed down the rows to the delegates.  Remember, there was no middle aisle; delegates from one CD melted into those from another CD in some areas. Frankly, it was a colossal, time-consuming mess, and several delegates from the 1st CD, sitting up in the balcony, never received ballots at all, their complaints ignored by the Chair. Question: does this actually invalidate the entire vote? Sounds rather like voter suppression out in Republican-land, doesn't it?

We had just heard from the candidates, all except George Wallace, who chose not to speak but was on "the slate" with Frank Leone. The system requires that DPVA choose two women and two men. Since there were only two women running, the contest was really among six men, but one withdrew before voting began, leaving Shawn O'DConnell, Frank Leone (slate), Lionell Spruill, George Wallace (slate), and Ben Tribbett. You could vote for "the slate" or for two individuals, and any ballot which showed a vote for more than two (such as "the slate" plus another name) would be thrown out. Tribbett was the wild card, i.e., a young insurgent who was running, he said, in order to introduce 21st century media and methods (think internet and cyber technology) to the DPVA, bringing into the Party the young Obama voters. Tribbett has enormous expertise and a brilliant command of political statistics as well as being a blogger, aka "Not Larry Sabato."

As it happens, Ben has a long and contentious history with old-line Fairfax Democrats, including a couple of fallings-out with well-entrenched Powers That Be (PTB), so a notably vicious campaign against him was conducted by the PTB prior to the Convention and right up to the moment voting began. It reminded me of, but was even more personal and nasty than, the Establishment's hatred of Jim Webb during Jim Webb's 2006 primary with Harris Miller, and the same group was involved this time around as well. The rationale of the PTB, as I heard it, was that Ben was unstable and would be an embarrassment to Virginia if turned loose on the DNC; just look at how he savaged people who disagreed with him (never mind this went both ways, of course). My observation was that the PTB would do anything necessary to defeat him and elect the slate of safe (but no doubt competent) two men, one white (Leone) and one black (Wallace).

The ballots were collected and vanished behind the scenes to be counted, and we waited. And waited. And waited some more. It was decided at some point in all this (I no longer am sure just when) that we would vote for the 23 Virginia delegates to the National Convention in Charlotte, North Carolina, so another count of delegates ensued before they passed out "the booklet" with the names of those running; only, it turned out, one name had been inadvertently left out, and this utterly confused many delegates who kept hearing convoluted directions on how to vote for delegates, alternates, and PLEOS (this was never explained but seemed to be elected officials and other political officers?). I heard one delegate after another complain that they had no idea who these people were, and they kept counting and recounting how many they had voted for, and "who was it that was left off the printed list?" and even "Hey, members of (x) CD, don't vote for me for PLEO."

Truthfully, I was shocked: when I receive notice of a shareholders' meeting from a company in which I own stock, and there is to be an election to the company's board of directors, there is always a brief biography of each candidate included. Why could not DPVA do likewise? And who proof-read "the booklet" and failed to notice one name was left off?  I trust it was only sloppy staff work, but responsibility for that always lands on the chief's shoulders, IMO.

Word was tweeted to a neighboring delegate that, first, a challenge had been made against one Chair of a local CD because he was refusing to certify any delegate who did not promise to vote for "the slate;" and next, that Frank Leone had won DNC delegate with something like 55% of the vote.  This meant we would have a second ballot (and possibly even a third) to select the second male from among Wallace, Spruill, and Tribbett.  I have since been told that the result of the first ballot was received about 12:45 PM, but that the Chair did not announce this fact until 1:15 PM. By that time stage crews were beginning to dismantle the set in order to prepare for the next event due at 3 PM in the Hall, and buses were arriving to collect delegates and return them to distant parts of Virginia. Another roll call was taken before they would pass out ballots for the second election.

Here are the delegate counts I noted for each CD, first and second roll call: 1st CD: 113/125; 2d CD: 51/48; 3rd CD 100/98; 4th CD 110/111; 5th CD 152/152; 6th CD: 61/55; 7th CD: 141/154; 8th CD: 249/217; 9th CD 79/99; 10th CD: 184/182; and 11th CD: 244/232; resulting in totals of voting delegates of 1,484/1,453 (at least as announced). There was some confusion on the second roll call about whether or not certified delegates who were absent from their seats but present and acting as observers of the tallying, could be included and receive a ballot. The Chair, uncertain how to handle this, decided to wait until the missing delegates returned to their seats from the tallying, which irritated other CDs who had delegates who were in the rest rooms and had not yet returned. And so it went.

Suddenly, a clearly distraught Lionell Spruill surged to the microphone, and in a strained voice announced that he did "not like" what was going on, but that he was a "good Democrat" and was withdrawing from the race, adding something about there wasn't any time for a second and probably even a third ballot. Many delegates booed and cried "No!", but the Chair quickly accepted his withdrawal. It seemed to me that the Chair was conflicted, he kept looking to the side as if for direction from one or two members of the PTB. He was anxious to do the job he had been sent to do, IMO, which seemed to be to ensure the election of "the slate," but he was afraid he could not control things and still be, or appear to be, even-handed. Moreover, there were the stage hands running around behind him and along the outside aisles dismantling his convention before his eyes.

This left George Wallace (who had never spoken to the convention at all) and Ben Tribbett, the outlier. That is to say, when Spruill (an African-American) withdrew, that left one black (Wallace) and one white (Tribbett) male for the remaining DNC slot. Did the PTB, fearing that two African-Americans might split the black vote, leaving Ben Tribbett a winner and no black Democrat in the Virginia DNC delegation, decide to force Spruill to withdraw? Which prospect worried them more, no blacks or Ben on the DNC? Or am I being inappropriate even to wonder about such things?

At that point the Chair announced that we must clear the Hall, adjourn and reconvene an hour later at the Mason inn in order to comnplete the balloting. Chaos erupted on the floor. The Chair of the 8th CD demanded a "suspension of the rules" and a voice vote. More chaos ensued and the Chair finally recognized the past Chair of the Fairfax County Committee, who requested a "division of the house" instead of a voice vote. The Chair agreed and told delegates to stand if they wanted to vote "aye." He then announced a clear majority had voted "aye," despite many complaints, and construed that vote to mean a suspension of the rules.

Then, with delegates streaming out of the hall and boarding their busses to depart, Ben Tribbett, the supposedly wild and unstable young guy, showed real class, stepped forward, and withdrew his name from the ballot, leaving George Wallace, the other member of "the slate" - who never spoke on his own behalf to the convention delegates - the winner by default. The Chair declared the convention over, and later was heard commenting that "it all ended up very well" in the end.

This all happened on Saturday in the Center for the Arts. The action really began Friday at the Mason Inn, with early registration, several receptions, such as one for Asian-American Democrats.I also attended a luncheon meeting with DPVA staff and a few delegates about future plans for the Party organization, a thank you party for Jim Webb, and so on. After the closing of the Convention there were additional meetings and parties at the Mason Inn. What they did not have were such things as I have seen at other conventions (like Realtors' meetings), including training sessions, documentaries, seminars or brain-storming meetings. This was a missed opportunity in my mind; since the festivities ran over two days anyway, the time could have been better used, and the networking made even more productive.

CONCLUSIONS: The Convention was poorly designed and poorly run, almost embarrassingly so. As I left the Hall, I kept overhearing the comment "What a fiasco!" Anyone with experience in such matters, especially when you include Democrats in the mix, should never have considered the Patriot Center as a venue. If they hoped to get President Obama to speak, and thereby fill the Center, shouldn't they have at least ensured his availability and willingness before signing the contract? Falling back to the Mason Inn and the Center for the Arts might have worked if they had full control of the venue for the entire day. I am still stunned by the ineptitude. Heads should roll, but within the DPVA there seems to be NO accountability.

As I have commented elsewhere on Blue Virginia, what I observed in the final analysis looked very much like a classic example of an entrenched clique that confused its own personal position of power with the good of the overall organization. Strip away the personality conflicts and all the frou-frou, and the clique/PTB responded defensively and ruthlessly, refusing to admit to its coveted ranks an insurgent who represented the rising generation. This is the manner in which a privileged clique historically responds, despite clear evidence that dismissal of outsiders knocking at the gates only ends up in the long run destroying the organization itself.

The maneuvers at the end of the convention can thus be seen as a successful tactical move ("the slate won!") but a strategic mistake. I say this regretfully, even while acknowledging that the PTB no doubt have some reason for believing that the insurgent might be a loose cannon (like, say, Doug Wilder, or even former Republican Jim Webb). But one must ask, is it not more prudent to have such a possible problem where one can use him for what he has to offer, and where one can keep an eye on him (aka, "inside the tent")?  Entrenched cliques, if they want to survive and prosper, must sometimes deal with prickly personalities they regard as uncouth, people who carry baggage of their own, and are not, unfortunately, knights in shining armor.

The DPVA is dangerously ingrown. Whether its Powers That Be (many of whom are completely outside the formal table of organization) have no real idea of how to reach out to new blood or insurgents, or whether they simply have contempt for any "outsiders" including their own grassroots, the result is the same: an atrophied, sclerotic party, where the PTB defend their turf, little understanding that turf is shrinking around them every day. Consider how their Maginot Line mentality keeps doing the same thing over and over, defending fewer and fewer incumbents, leaving 80 percent of Assembly seats uncontested, and losing election after election, but by golly they still control the party apparatus!  

The solution, IMO, is for that (increasingly large) part of the reform-minded grassroots to buckle down and begin a reform from the bottom up, and that means getting their rear in gear, doing the grunt labor of attending meetings and volunteering for the dull but essential groundwork, knowing the ins and outs of procedure and bylaws...and taking over the party for the 21st century.

Tags: , , , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email

Ironically (0.00 / 0)
"the slate" might well have won the election anyway, but the PTB apparently did not want the risk. I wonder who persuaded Spruill to be a "good Democrat" and withdraw?

Another factoid (0.00 / 0)
that may be important is that somewhere between a third and half (at least) of the delegates had never attended a DPVA Convention before. This became evident when the Chair asked for a show of hands at the start if this was "your first Convention." That may account for some of the bewilderment and confusion---- and, also, for some of the disappointment and anger I heard exporessed later.

Excellent recap, thanks for writing this! (0.00 / 0)
Also, I'm wondering, how would you suggest getting "reform-minded grassroots" motivated enough about a party and process they view with disdain/disgust to get "their rear in gear" and "[take] over the party for the 21st century?" I'm highly skeptical that will ever happen, but I'm all ears for how to make it so!

Follow me on Twitter. Follow Blue Virginia on Facebook and Twitter.

Membership on the Central Committee is crucial to DPVA reform, but.... (0.00 / 0)
The large majority of Central Committee members are Congressional District Committee members, who are elected for four-year terms. There is no direct correlation between size of a county/city committee and the much more limited size of the CD committees, which creates a dispropotionate county representation on the DPVA Central Commitee. For example, my Prince William County Democratic Committee (PWCDC) is split among three Congressional Districts, the 1st, 10th and 11th. Redistricting moved my precinct from the 11th to the 10th CD, with the result that PWC now gets a single seat on the 10th CD committee. That seems to me to be a very unfair distribution of seats for my county on the Central Committee DPVA governing body.

We hear a lot of comments to the effect that Prince William County is the swing county for one of the most important swing states in the nation, but yet our representation on the state governing body is so small that we have almost no power to reform any aspect of the DPVA operations, rules, or election of DPVA officers.

At the Dec. 2011 DPVA quarterly meetings, I sat in on what I thought was an excellent open-discussion session during which we discussed at some length the under-representation of some counties on the Central Committee. One man from a rural district suggested an at-large Central Committee member not associated with CD committee membership. That idea has been discussed (and discarded) before on the basis that the Central Committee would become too large. But given the fact that at a typical Central Committee quarterly meeting, it is not unusual for only 5-6 of the 25+ CD committee members to attend. For example, at one of the quarterly meetings I attended last year the 9th CD committee (that had travelled the greatest distance) had more attendees (7) than did the 11th CD committee (only 5). That low attendance level means that only the "Powers That Be" old guard attend regularly, which enables them to prevent any reforms.

One proposal I have for the DPVA is that they should revise the by-laws to require regular attendance at quarterly meetings, and CD committee members who skip two of the four meetings in a year should be removed and give another person an opportunity to fill the seat.

Right now we have too much power held by too few people, and until we can make membership on the Central Committee more open that will never change.



[ Parent ]
Another thought about how CD Committee membership is determined. (0.00 / 0)
This is getting a bit off-topic from Teddy's diary, but with the basic point being that we need wholesale improvement of DPVA performance (which is "governed" by Central Committee decisions)I had one additional thought about how to improve the fairness of the CD Committee member selection.

My idea is that the number of members should not be allocated by county, but rather allow all member applicants to compete for the 25 elective seats more or less as "at large" candidates.  Since Loudoun County currently gets to decide who from their LCDC membership will fill many more seats that does PWCD the result is that regardless of how well their county committee performs in supporting candidates, a higher-performing county committee such as the Prince William County committee ends up with a single seat even though our committee has done much better in some recent election cycles than has LCDC. It was not long ago when the LCDC was basically disfunctional before the past chair was replaced by the new current chair, and that has not been the case for PWCDC. So, from a performance standpoint it makes sense to me that whichever CD committee member candidates can bring out the most supporters to vote for them during each quadrennial re-organization/election of officers should be able to compete in the form of an "at large" election. Then the county applicants/committees who bring the most voters to the caucus would get the most seats. The present system is both unfair and undemocratic.

So, the short version is that I'd like to see the rules revised to allow each CD Committee member applicant competing individually for one of the 25 seats as an at-large candidate so each person is competing on an equal basis. I think that's the only way we will ever correct the major imbalance of power on the Central Committee that could lead to some real DPVA reform,and seems to me to be the only democratic way to elect members of the Central Committee.

                          T.C.


[ Parent ]
One Big Problem We Have (0.00 / 0)
Is when people have a "micro" issue (such as how many seats their county gets on a specific CD committee) that gets thrown in with the bigger issues of reform that Teddy describes above.  

No offense intended to Tom Counts, but these kinds of distractions is part of what slows the reform movement.


[ Parent ]
How was the distribution of seats (0.00 / 0)
figured? I did not grow up in Virginia politics, so please enlighten me... is the distribution in any way tied to dpi, Democratic performance in, say, presidential elections? Maybe we should be looking at reforming the governing documents of the DPVA to start with....?

[ Parent ]
Yes (0.00 / 0)
The number of seats a locality gets on a congressional district committee is tied to the Democratic performance and the population of the area in question. Thus, the number of delegates to the state convention (same people as delegates to the district convention) is also tied to Democratic performance in elections and to population.

A glitch sometimes occurs when a county or city is divided between a couple of congressional districts. Roanoke County is one example. It is divided between the 6th and the 9th districts. That makes the math hard for areas like that.


[ Parent ]
"CrowsNest" view (0.00 / 0)
Delegates seated in the upper tiers of the Arts Center had to deal with little ventilation, heat, and some seating "in the dark" with little lighting. Floor "discussions" were at times inaudible.

Lets face it..its a performing arts center..meant for people to be seated...The venue was not suitable for moving around..especially for ballot distribution and vote tallying. Larger persons had difficulty maneuvering through the aisles.
A lot of folks did not return to their seats following the lunch break.

Not sure when the PTB knew they had to shift to the Arts Center..but at a minimum could have included some videos and music, cheers, SOMETHING, to keep delegates entertained during the long breaks and pauses.

On the positive side..Hope that newcomers to the Arts Center return to enjoy some excellent performances..it REALLY is a great venue for the performing arts. Carry on!



How can voters trust Dems... (0.00 / 0)
...to manage and lead public affairs when we can't manage and lead our own very well?

Let's be honest: Repubs have the advantage of management and leadership training in two of their core institutions, business and the military.  We need to close this gap by instituting basic training and procedures on how to run meetings and processes effectively, at a minimum.

If the PTB were tyranical but competent, they may be able to survive a little longer, like the benevolent dictators of the past.  But tyrannical and incompetent is a recipe for disaster and revolution.  

For a Sustainable Virginia. Now on Twitter.


Getting the grassroots involved in the system (0.00 / 0)
is unfortunately iffy, as lowkell so nicely pointed out (above). This is always the case with any organisation that depends on volunteers, like the DPVA; people simply do not have the time. This is one reason the structure is loaded with retirees and old-timers who have settled in to their personal niche and won't let go--- we talked about this after my series called "Hard Lessons" following the Deeds disaster, er, campaign.

DPVA asks a lot of its volunteer leaders, so most of them burn out or eventually give up and do a lousy job, which is why one suggestion has been to provide local committees with professional staff, physical office space, training (for candidates and leaders) and on-going support including how to recruit more members through events/campaigns/entertainment not directly related to politics per se. How to pay for this? Perhaps establish an endowment fund, an education foundation whose funds will not be used for candidates/campaigns, or some kind of Super-PAC (I mean, separate from DPVA).

We already have DFA and OFA, and we have The Brigades composed of grassroots ants like me as a nucleus for extra-curricular political operations, plus bluevirginia.us as a communications arm. So let me turn your question back on you, Lowell: how can BlueVirginia get the reformers together to create and implement a business plan for changing DPVA?


Tough question. (0.00 / 0)
The "reformers" are scattered, a lot of them don't read the blogs or participate here, some are on social media but a lot aren't particularly, it's really a mixed bag.  Also, I doubt that everyone is on the same page in terms of diagnosing the problems that exist, let alone how to treat them. So...got me.

Follow me on Twitter. Follow Blue Virginia on Facebook and Twitter.

[ Parent ]
Social media... (0.00 / 0)
combined with BlueVirginia, a modern-day Committee of Correspondence? Hmm...

[ Parent ]
Menu

Make a New Account

Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?


Advertising



FOLLOW BLUE VIRGINIA on SOCIAL MEDIA


Donate to Blue Virginia

About
The purpose of Blue Virginia is to cover Virginia politics from a progressive and Democratic perspective. This is a group blog and a community blog. We invite everyone to comment here, but please be aware that profanity, personal attacks, bigotry, insults, rudeness, frequent unsupported or off-point statements, "trolling" (NOTE: that includes outright lies, whether about climate science, or what other people said, or whatever), and "troll ratings abuse" (e.g., "troll" rating someone simply because you disagree with their argument) are not permitted and, if continued, will lead to banning. For more on trolling, see the Daily Kos FAQs. Also note that diaries may be deleted if they do not contain at least 2 solid paragraphs of original text; if not, please use the comments section of a relevant diary. For more on writing diaries, click here. Thanks, and enjoy!

P.S. You can contact us at lowell@raisingkaine.com and you can subscribe to Lowell's Twitter feed here. If you'd like to subscribe to Miles Grant's Twitter feed, click here. For Teacherken, click here. For Kindler, click here.

P.P.S. To see the Blue Virginia archive, please click here. To see the Raising Kaine archive, please click here. To see the Blue Commonwealth archive, please click here.



RSS Feed

Subscribe to Blue Virginia - Front Page


Real Time Web Analytics
Powered by: SoapBlox