Home | Virginia
Politics
| National
Politics
Menu

Make a New Account

Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?


Poll
How Enthused Are You About Tim Kaine for Senate?
Wildly Enthused, I LOVE Tim Kaine!
Strongly Enthused, I like Kaine a lot, Allen sux
Moderately enthused: Kaine's fine, Allen sux
Not enthused about Kaine, but Allen sux
Not at all enthused about this race
I'm voting for George Allen

Results

Weather

Search




Advanced Search


Blog Roll
Virginia Blogs
All Politics is Local
Augusta Free Press
Bacon's Rebellion
Coarse Cracked Corn
Crew of 42
DemRulz
Dixie Pig
Equality Loudoun
The Fix (WaPo)
Greater Greater Washington
The Green Miles
Leaving My Marc
Leesburg Tomorrow
Loudoun Progress
Moonhowlings
New Dominion Project
Not Larry Sabato
Off K Street
Old Dominion Blogs
Ox Road South Blog
Renaissance Ruminations
Richmonder
Richmond Sunlight
RTD VA Politics blog
Roanoke Times blog
Shad Plank
SlantBlog
Too Conservative
True Adventures of the Doorbell Queen
VB Dems
Virginia Education Report
WaPo - Virginia Politics Blog
Waldo Jaquith
Waldo's VA Political Blogroll

Progressive Legal Directory www.criminallawyervirginia.net
www.virginia-duilawyers.com
www.virginia-personalinjurylawyer.com
www.recklessdrivinglawyer.net
www.helpdisabilitylawyer.com
www.criminallawdc.com
www.duilawsdc.com

ADT Home Security in Virginia

Anti-Solar Pundits and Politicians Are Wrong: New Report Shows That Solar's Growing Fast!

by: lowkell

Mon Oct 17, 2011 at 09:48:53 AM EDT


Cross posted from Scaling Green

If the latest job numbers from The Solar Foundation's (TSF) National Solar Jobs Census 2011 are any indication, the bloviating by anti-solar jobs pundits and politicians is...well...really wrong. Unhinged from reality wrong.

Unlike self-appointed clean energy experts, such as Rush Limbaugh and the Wall Street Journal's Stephen Moore, TSF Executive Director Andrea Luecke is actually an expert on such things. At TSF (a Tigercomm client), she authors the Solar Census and leads work on two U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) grants: Solar America Communities and Solar Instructor Training Network. And, she used to run the City of Milwaukee's U.S. DOE Solar America Cities program.

Luecke stopped by the Scaling Green Communicating Energy lecture series to talk about the Census, a follow-up to the 2010 census. Together, the two years' of data show meaningful trend lines that cannot be ignored.

Among them is the fact that the U.S. solar industry has grown 10 times faster than the national economy as a whole over the last 12 months, in the middle of the worst economy since the Great Depression. What about the fossil fuels that underwrite many anti-solar pundits and politicians? Those sectors saw a net job loss of two percent.

I guess the "hate renewable energy jobs" crowd that has been using Solyndra to run down other clean energy companies [see here and here have to re-cork the champagne. Consider other Census findings:

lowkell :: Anti-Solar Pundits and Politicians Are Wrong: New Report Shows That Solar's Growing Fast!
  • There are more than 100,000 solar jobs in all 50 states.
  • Among the top 10 states experiencing solar job growth, California had the highest at 25,575. Colorado, Arizona, Pennsylvania, New York, Florida, Texas, Oregon, New Jersey and Massachusetts make up the remainder of the top 10.
  • The growing list of jobs includes installation, manufacturing and also areas such as sales and distribution, which are actually the fastest growing (companies like Sungevity (a client of Tigercomm's and a TSF board member), SolarCity, and SunRun that provide no-money down solar leases are great examples of this specific type of job growth).
  • Over the next 12 months, almost 50% of solar firms expect to add jobs.

So what accounts for the differences between the top 10 states and the remaining 40? No surprise there. As Luecke pointed out, the states with the most robust solar job industries and job growth rates had made the policy investment to get them. The top 10 states support increased production of energy from renewable sources (like solar carve-outs) and provide consumer incentives such as tax credits.

According to the Census, the industry could grow by up 24 percent and create 24,000 new jobs by August 2012, but Luecke said this projection can only happen with consistent policies in state markets.

With an unemployment rate of nine percent and most employers scaling back hiring, why is it that some in Congress have decided they should oppose a job-producing sector that is, we assert, the energy source with the least amount of government support? Wouldn't it be better to actually support the growth of this industry, rather than try to hurt it?

Luecke had other interesting points, to make, including the fossil fuel industry's fuzzy math on their job totals - more on that in future posts. But for now, take a look at the Solar Foundation to read the full Census report. It's an eye opener.

Tags: , , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email

I cannnot tell whether (4.00 / 1)
you are a troll, a gas industry hack, or just a BIG consumer of oil/gas industry propaganda (strongly suspet the last).  You robo your "facts" as if you have listened to all the deceptive whitewash of fracking and Big Oil and believed every word of it. As for the pipeline you so clearly support you haven't looked at the entire cost of the pollution of that project, the turning of the tar mess into a useful product, the pollution of the effort, nor its threat to the water supply of tens of millions of Americans in the Midwest. I imagine you probably hope the drinking water of NY City is sacrificed to fracking as well.  (Go ahead an believe industry lies and propaganda, but don't try to pitch it to us and expect us to buy it.)

At least a few of the bloggers here are a heck of a lot more informed on energy than you apparently know.  Indeed in at lest three cases it boils down to EXPERTISE.  So don't insult them with snot-nosed snarks about your pretend "facts."

Instead of helping with the phasing out the internal combustion engine in automobiles, and the implementation of greener technologies which are already available, politicians seem hell-bent on trying with all their might to prop up the dirty fuel industry and bleed every last drop from an obsolete source of energy. Some have gone so far as suggesting we divert natural gas away from home heat to use by cars (a diversion that I think would be both stupid and a terrible mistake--but note that that is my opinion. I do not state it as fact the way you twist opinion in your comment). It all goes to show who runs this country (along with, apparently, your brain) and that is the oil/gas companies.

It just goes to show that a population can be duped pretty easily and/or cheaply. From the oil barons to their henchmen in both parties to the airwaves and onto cable, the propaganda just keeps rolling along. You've become a conduit. No, this article above isn't wrong. You are. We will not gain energy independence until people like you get the facts.  What is the likelihood of that?  


There's nothing in the middle of the road except yellow stripes and dead armadillos (Jim Hightower). PS I'm on Twitter here.


You're high stepping my point (0.00 / 2)
and my argument has never been one of pro or con, but the simple realization that regulators get it, planners get, but the environmental lobbyists and folks like yourself do not.  I haven't read any expert advice here in terms of how all these lovely new ideas will be implemented into the power grid and neither have you.  Insteady Try the DOE, RMI, GI or EPRI, or heck go to our own utility providers website www.dom.com .      

Do renewable power projects promote new jobs?  Of course they do, but my point wasn't that they don't.  This and other green ideas have been a running "feud" I have had with two ppl on this page.  

The inconvenient truth is the transition from fossil to alternative, isn't anywhere close to a switch.  Its a progression which means certain fossil fuel exploration, expansion and generation, including nuclear, must continue while the fruits from R&D spending, pilots and other smarter technologies are transitioned into the grid.  I oppose your sides all out effort to deny these facts and stop fossil fuel proposals in the country, let alone in our state.  

The main point, which environmentalists stupidly bypass or simply don't know, is the crucial role certain fossil fuels will play as a backup, for the foreseeable future, as a necessary part of every single megawatt of electricity implemented into the grid from any renewable energy resource.  Without it, not only will a utility provider be in violation with federal law, such resource will not be marketable, and no sane state regulator will force its expense onto it ratepayers.  Do you still reject this or do you not know what I am talking about?  

Also, because of this, renewable resources in the mid-term, cannot make considerable headway thru most state regulators, such as our SCC, because the power grid currently lacks expanded natural gas infrastructure, ECC and smart grid technologies.  Yet enviro want to force these things prematurely, and this is costing ratepayers needlessly, all while damaging the overall perception of the very cause they seem to be promoting.  

The fact is, the grid isn't ready yet, and the simple reason there aren't more wind turbines, solar arrays and pv singles, siding and roofing everywhere, doesn't mean the transition to a smarter, greener energy infrastructure isn't being implemented full bore.  The building blocks, natural gas infracture, smartgrid and EEC programs, all need to be in the works, ready to go and to engage and optimize these intermittent resources, which renewables are.  Renewables offer intermittent sources of electricity, often during times of lower demand, and will be more or less, unusable unless vast investments are in place to implement them into the system or transmit them to loads in far away locations.  Renewables are also unreliable sources of electricity, as they are not guaranteed resources 24/7.  Therefore, as a stand-alone resource, renewables are not desired by the markets.  For the foreseeable future, price per kWh renewables demand are way too expensive for the obvious reason, so ratepayers shun them, so utility regulators don't want to force them needlessly on utilities.  But that's the goal of government regulators and the electric power industry, to make renewable resources reliable as a "package" with other resources, which will make them a marketable resource.  That's the point.

My goodness, look who wants "green" energy just as much as you?  The difference is, what we know.  Without understanding how all these wonderful ideas we read about are to be implemented, as well what challenges they face in structural sense, the fight for change is far less effective; and certain aspects and elements in the power grid are left untargeted.  Such things are instead, are left for power companies to correct on their own, that's if the state regulators doesn't direct them to change those things themselves.  Your aim is off.  

Of course, you'll take offense to me suggesting the notion I know more about this than experts on here.  I won't say, shame on you for not knowing what I know, or spouting off at me like you have, but plz spare me your concept of energy independence, security and reliability.  If any three of you truly understood these three, you'd see that holding the banner "Stop global warming! More green energy! More green jobs!" is for kids and minds that don't know better.  It will be interesting who between the three of you, will get there first and tell the others.  Until that time, I look forward to an improved discussion with all of you soon.  


[ Parent ]
so now I'm a troll?! (0.00 / 0)
The only thing I have done is post an opinion not in sync with your green vision.  For that I'm labelled a troll by this website's founder, or as in the previous comment, censored off of the page.  Is this what democracy looks like in the progressive realm of discussion?  

[ Parent ]
Your first comment in this thread was troll rated (0.00 / 0)
by three people and unproductive by another. And no, it wasn't just because you are "not in sync with [our] green vision." Go read your first comment, and the latest one, and listen to your false statements, red herrings, straw men, dripping condescension, insults ("libs," "snot-nosed snarks," etc., etc.). The only question is, why didn't we boot you from the blog a long time ago?  Probably because we "libs" put up with too much crap.  At this point, though, you're right on the edge. It's your choice which way it goes.

Follow me on Twitter.

[ Parent ]
how about a reply with some substance? (0.00 / 1)
why not drop your weapon and think about what it is I am telling you?  You are perceiving it as snarky, mean and insensitive, because I'm not liberal.  And why does being called a lib or liberal insult you?  I'm merely placing some emotion on a point to elevate the importance of how misdirected I believe you are.  The previous poster did but I didn't take offense.  

But more importantly, it appears to me you don't just totally disagree with me, you must not understand what I am talking about.  I'm quite surprised, and I guess this explain why you want to boot me.  So what it boils down to, is me having to post a diary to prove a point as I once had to do a few years ago under the RK blog.  

There is so much more behind what fuels changes than you post about.  If this hell-raising & politcal bashing is your idea of firing up the troops and spreading the word out, then I find it no error whatsoever to spread what I believe is the honest to God truth.  


[ Parent ]
Making It Local (0.00 / 0)
Fairfax County spends about $37 million annually on fossil fuels to operate our general county and school facilities.  I am proud and thankful Democratic and Republican senators and delegates helped put me on the November 8 ballot for Fairfax County Chairman.  I am honored the Independent Green Party trusts me to address their concerns.

Together we will make smart investments to lower our operating costs while generating energy through clean, local resources.

Thank you for letting me share.

A. Will Radle, Jr. (I)
Independent Candidate for Chairman,
Fairfax County Board of Supervisors
YouTube.com/WillRadle1


Advertising

Donate to Blue Virginia

About
The purpose of Blue Virginia is to cover Virginia politics from a progressive and Democratic perspective. This is a group blog and a community blog. We invite everyone to comment here, but please be aware that profanity, personal attacks, bigotry, insults, rudeness, frequent unsupported or off-point statements, and "trolling" (NOTE: that includes outright lies, whether about climate science, or what other people said, or whatever) are not permitted and, if continued, will lead to banning. For more on trolling, see the Daily Kos FAQs. Also note that diaries may be deleted if they do not contain at least 2 solid paragraphs of original text; if not, please use the comments section of a relevant diary. For more on writing diaries, click here. Thanks, and enjoy!

P.S. You can contact us at lowell@raisingkaine.com and you can subscribe to Lowell's Twitter feed here. If you'd like to subscribe to Miles Grant's Twitter feed, click here. For Teacherken, click here. For Kindler, click here.

P.P.S. To see the Blue Virginia archive, please click here. To see the Raising Kaine archive, please click here. To see the Blue Commonwealth archive, please click here.



RSS Feed

Subscribe to Blue Virginia - Front Page


Powered by: SoapBlox