Home | Virginia
Politics
| National
Politics
Menu

Make a New Account

Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?


Poll
Should Democrats Move Their Convention Out of North Carolina?
No, I agree with the anti-gay-marriage amendment
No, lots of states have these amendments
No, it's too late to change
No, we want to win North Carolina this November
Yes, we need to take a stand against bigotry
Yes, NC's amendment is particularly heinous
Yes, we're not going to win NC anyway
Yes for many reasons

Results

Weather

Search




Advanced Search


Blog Roll
Virginia Blogs
All Politics is Local
Augusta Free Press
Bacon's Rebellion
Coarse Cracked Corn
Crew of 42
DemRulz
Dixie Pig
Equality Loudoun
The Fix (WaPo)
Greater Greater Washington
The Green Miles
Leaving My Marc
Leesburg Tomorrow
Loudoun Progress
Moonhowlings
New Dominion Project
Not Larry Sabato
Off K Street
Old Dominion Blogs
Ox Road South Blog
Renaissance Ruminations
Richmonder
Richmond Sunlight
RTD VA Politics blog
Roanoke Times blog
Shad Plank
SlantBlog
Too Conservative
True Adventures of the Doorbell Queen
VB Dems
Virginia Education Report
WaPo - Virginia Politics Blog
Waldo Jaquith
Waldo's VA Political Blogroll

Progressive Legal Directory www.criminallawyervirginia.net
www.virginia-duilawyers.com
www.virginia-personalinjurylawyer.com
www.recklessdrivinglawyer.net
www.helpdisabilitylawyer.com
www.criminallawdc.com
www.duilawsdc.com

ADT Home Security in Virginia

The Great Betrayal

by: Teddy Goodson

Wed Jul 13, 2011 at 19:36:19 PM EDT


Dear Mr. President, Speaker Boehner, Senators, and Members of Congress:

I am retired, and I want to be sure I understand what is going on: According to news reports, you are all negotiating among yourselves to reduce the national budget deficit before you raise the so-called debt ceiling of the United States (in order to pay America's bills), and I heard that you have decided to put Social Security and Medicare "on the table" in order to reach a deal with each other. I guess this means that Uncle Sam is considering cutting what they refer to as my "benefits," and the President has said that, if you all do not get an agreement before August, he cannot guarantee that my next Social Security check will be sent to me.

I am dependent on my small monthly Social Security check to survive, because I lost almost all my other savings in the recent stock market crash---- I thought I was being prudent and responsible, when I invested what I could scrape together in Wall Street, but I was wrong, they squandered my money. I knew, though, I had a backup plan with Social Security because I paid into Social Security for over 40 years when I was working, with the understanding that these payments were like premiums, and that I had a contract with my government for an annuity in my old age. Social Security is my annuity contract, and you people cannot now just change the contract I paid for after all these years.

It is not my fault you people in Washington have been irresponsible, and thrown away my premiums just the way Wall Street did. The same goes for my Medicare. Social Security and Medicare cannot be "on the table." Uncle Sam owes me what I have been paying for, a contract is a contract, and my government cannot cheat me in my old age. This is a matter of life and death for people like me. Please help.

Sincerely,
Alpha Granny

Teddy Goodson :: The Great Betrayal
I am afraid that Alpha Granny is touchingly naive. Yes, she did everything according to the rules: worked hard, paid her taxes, even understood that Social Security was never intended to be more than a cushion because she saved whatever extra she could afford and invested it, ahem, privately, in The Market, just as she was advised to do---- but in the end, she was a chump, because she thought "her" government owed her what it promised her. Based on, you know, the full faith and credit of the United States of America.

We now know that the system does not like little, un-ruthless, un-greedy, un-rich dummies who trust the word of perfidious Uncle Sam. What is not so understandable is exactly how we arrived at this sorry state of affairs. The Republican explanation is straightforward, black-and-white, and is that of the libertarians and free market adherents: Democratically-elected government over-promised by acceding to the demands of those less productive voters who figured they could get a free lunch forever by milking money from the really productive members of society, until finally they milked that cow dry, and the "welfare state" is naturally collapsing from the weight of their greed. In other words, taxes to support a comforting and nurturing community are nothing more than a way for the lazy and unproductive to steal from the righteous and productive in society.... so now, good riddance to the whole idea of social contract and nanny government, it is way past time to cut out that twentieth century nonsense. In other words, all power to those who are already super-rich, they've earned it.

It is hard to overstate the glee with which Republicans and free marketeers from the global corporations go about dismantling every protection sheltering the little people, siphoning away whatever crumbs of wealth the dupes may have tucked away, reducing them to such penury they can only strive to survive and are rendered incapable of fighting back.  The entire process has been described in excruciating detail by Naomi Klein in The Shock Doctrine. The tactics for bringing about America's version of the shock have been efficiently laid out by programs and policies created by The American Legislative Exchange Council (A.L.E.C.) and other corporate-funded front organizations and think tanks.  You can see these policies in action now in Scott Walker's Wisconsin and other states which voted in Republican governors and legislatures in 2010.

Implementing these tactics in the first place depends on the existence of a severe economic crisis, which can be engineered and pro-longed if it does not occur naturally (as actually happened during the '80's and '90's in third world countries seeking loans from the World Bank, according to Klein).  This is exactly what we Americans have been experiencing since the 2008 Wall Street implosion of the "too big to fails." Once this revolutionary opportunity has been seized by capable hands, one deliberate shock will be made to follow another. Needless to say, any real improvement in the economy will be short-circuited or crushed until the old social system collapses, and the New Order can be imposed at will on the lingering political chaos.  The new order?  Whatever you want to call it, it will solidify and reward the new elite who run the big corporations, and their flunkies and hangers-on. I myself call it corporate feudalism, a system in which nation states will become pretty much mere tools of global Big Money.

The main prize here is of course securing control of the United States. We are in the middle of that battle, although most people have no idea what is really going on---- the victims do not even recognize they are in such a war. One would like to think that the Democratic Party, because of its political history with FDR and the Great Depression, would recognize what is hapenning, sound the alarm, and be fighting vigorously for the people against the powerful corporations. Unfortunately, you would be wrong, at least when it comes to many national Democrats, not just in Congress but in the White House.

President Obama has been moving steadily to the right since his election, and it no longer possible to rationalize his retreat from the progressive change many thought he promised. Some worry that elements from the DLC, triangulating away, have determined that Obama's re-election depends on his "moving right," a decision reached while the President made his tour of Asia after the 2010 election. That is a story for another article; what we have to acknowledge here and now is that at this moment in time the contrived battle over the debt ceiling is being waged completely within the Republican, free marketeer framework, and it is nothing more than an exercise to see which party can move further to the right. So soon as the President offers a rightist proposal (like cutting Social Security) the more the Republicans demand ("put Obamacare on the table"). Every time Obama moves to the right, the corporate flunkies in Republican suits back off, complaining he is not willing to meet them in the middle, and is not serious. Having suggested cutting Social Security voluntarily, you can be sure the topic will never go away. He is suckered into a trap, and will be ambushed again and again. One cannot help but ask: Surely, he knows what is going on? But, what if he does, and it is all kabuki theatre?

Alpha Granny says that "a contract is a contract," and what she instinctively is asking for is what the intellectuals call "the rule of law."  That means the sanctity and enforceability of a contract, which is the very foundation of today's corporate business.  Poor old dear, rule of law really works only for those with clout. The middle class and the weak and un-rich have very little clout... and are about to be deprived of whatever clout they may once have had. Nothing so infuriates a free marketeering Republican as hearing some bleeding heart whine about protecting "the most vulnerable" among us; such sentiments deserve a sneer at best, if not a full-blown character assassination. The wise politician, alert to self-protection, is busily aligning himself with the predators, not the victims.  According to his calculation, the momentum is on the side of the Koch brothers' tribe. Just ask Eric Cantor, as he throws yet another monkey wrench into the works, with his characteristic sneer.  

Tags: , , , , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email

The Great Betrayal | 19 comments
Cantor (4.00 / 1)
Just saw on cnbc that Obama walked out of the meeting when Cantor interrupted him.
But, aside from the comment on SS I worked part time a few years ago as a rural mail carrier. There were several people on my route that had SS as their only income. They would be upset if the checks didn't come on time. For our part if a SS check came in we made sure it was delivered.
If this debt ceiling is not raised there will be some upset people and rightly so.

Obama walked out on Cantor? (4.00 / 2)
It's about time. I understand that Cantor (or another Republican, or maybe both) said that if Obama was "serious" he'd come to them on the Hill to negotiate---- this is all part of the ongoing Republican campaign to de-legitimize Obama. The hatred the die-hard Republicans feel for Obama is so all-consuming they seem to be willing to destroy the United States in order to get the upper hand with him and, in their view, gain political advantage. Obama has been slow to realize this obsession, and has held to his delusion that, if he only tries harder and offers them more and more, he can negotiate with them in good faith. If he's finally walked out, maybe it has dawned on him there is no such thing as good faith from the Republicans. Or patriotism, for that matter.

[ Parent ]
A little... (4.00 / 1)
A little racism mixed in with the ideology, perhaps????

[ Parent ]
Cantor usurping Boehner (0.00 / 0)
Not only is Cantor out of line with Obama, he is usurping the role of the Speaker of the House. I can't help but wonder if this is symbolic of a riff between traditional Republicans and the Tea Party.

On Social Security, I agree that nothing should be modified for existing recipients, but it does need to be tweaked for the long term. I think the S.S. issue is being used as a prop in this political theater. The real killer will be Medicare.


[ Parent ]
Obama called Check... (0.00 / 0)
Your move Cantor.

[ Parent ]
Sidewalk Act........ (0.00 / 0)
What actually happened in the cabinet room is being portrayed differently of course by GOP and DEM sources. What is patently obvious is that Cantor has taken his spin directly to the media which is unprecedented in high level negotiations. He made this move knowing full well that the far right, sound bite addicted, Fox news followers would eat this stuff up. Cantor is trying his damnedest to turn the current crisis into a stage to demonstrate his adherence to what the Tea Party and similar whackos want.

[ Parent ]
Are you kidding me? (0.00 / 0)
Social Security is not a promise. Never has been. Social Security is an anti-poverty program largely targeted at seniors. It's no more of a promise than welfare was for poor single mothers. Social Security isn't a contract. It's not an annuity.

The only thing on the table as far as Social Security is concerned is a change to how the government calculates inflation. It would be part of a wider effort to better calculate inflation for a range of government policies. If that's going to be enough to drive someone into poverty, well then let's take a look at shoring up benefits for those in the greatest need. But let's not act like it's violating some sacred promise.


Funny, isn't it, (0.00 / 0)
how after 40 years of paying into the plan for over 40 years Granny mught get the idea that that was her money, there to help her when she needed it in her old age... almost as if it's hers.

[ Parent ]
Taxes are taxes (0.00 / 0)
People pay taxes. The length of time that someone pays taxes doesn't give them any greater claim to expenditures. Would you say that someone who pays more in taxes, say a multi-billionaire, should be entitled to more government spending to help them, say subsidies, than someone like us?

And again, no Democrats are suggesting that we abolish Social Security. Hell, none of the Republicans are even pushing privatization (for now). The only change on the table would be on how increases to Granny's benefits are calculated. Would her benefits still go up, on average, year to year, as the cost of living goes up with inflation? Yes. Would it be slightly less than how benefits go up now, but more in line with actual inflation? Yes. Is that so fundamentally unfair? No.


[ Parent ]
But rich people should be willing to pay significantly more (0.00 / 0)
they've gotten 88 % OF the  proceeds of  the recovery and yet their defenders are refusing to pay back one red cent. Something is wrong with that

[ Parent ]
Totally (0.00 / 0)
So let's adjust the way we calculate inflation for Social Security and other programs, AND repeal the Bush Tax Cuts for the rich. I'm sold!

[ Parent ]
Nothing To Do With The Debt or Revenue (0.00 / 0)
This continuing attack on Social Security is not about the debt ceiling or the revenue stream of the U.S. It is about Republican misers and thieves seeing free money for them.
The attack on Social Security viability is a separate issue; one that Obama lost my vote and support over.

The debt is the difference between the Bush tax cuts and the Bush caused Depression and what should be going on. That Obama keeps Iraq, Afghanistan and Libya wars going on contributes trillions to the failure.

Any talk about Social Security is the continuing effort of the Republicans since FDR to destroy America and their efforts to rid Americans of money.

The debt should be erased by killing the Bush/Obama tax cuts for the ultra-wealthy, I do blame Obama for supporting the extension and his refusal to actually fight for the American people against those tax cuts. The debt should also be relieved by increasing the tax rate on the ultra-wealthy.

Mere parsimony is not economy. Expense, and great expense, may be an essential part in true economy.
Edmund Burke


[ Parent ]
It's Part of a Bigger Problem (0.00 / 0)
Social Security does have a part to play in discussions about our nation's finances in the future.

The current deficit (not debt) is driven largely by the Bush tax cuts, the recession, the wars, and other increases in spending during the aughts.

The projected deficit, in the medium to long term, is driven largely by a one time increase in Social Security expenses related to the Baby Boomers and the constantly increasing cost of Medicare due to the ever rising cost of health care (and the Baby Boomers).

We have a one time challenge to adjust Social Security to changing demographics. Once the Baby Boomers settle into retirement it's projected we'll reach a new equilibrium with our population structure. I say tackle the challenge and improve the program overall to target seniors at the edge of poverty.

I'm more than happy to discuss changes to formulas in Social Security to better reflect actual increases in costs of living. I'd love to see changes to the formulas for how benefits are calculated in order to make them more generous for those seniors living on the edge. And I've love to pair that with changes for seniors that are doing just fine. But let's not pretend that doing so would be the end of America.


[ Parent ]
Obama... (0.00 / 0)
Used the extension of the tax cuts to get an extension in unemployment insurance out of Congress - something we desperately needed at the time (and still do).  He tried to get cuts passed only for the "middle class", but the Senate couldn't even get it to the floor for a vote.  Other than letting the cuts drop off for everyone, including those making the least, AND allowing UI to drop off, what were his options?  I agree that it's crap, but it seems to me that it was the best crap he could get at the time.

[ Parent ]
Taxes... (0.00 / 0)
Don't generally come with a yearly statement telling you how much you'll be getting from your investment when you retire.  Granny has every right to believe the way she does.

[ Parent ]
So? (0.00 / 0)
The major changes to Social Security on the table wouldn't diminish the number on Granny's yearly statement telling her how much she'll be getting, the major change is on how that check would go up year to year under cost of living adjustments.

[ Parent ]
We 'fixed' Social Security before, already (4.00 / 2)
if you remember, but Congress monkeyed with the slush fund at once.  
Taxes: The contributions (what Alpha Granny thinks of as her premiums) went into the accounting folder for future SS payments, but it was, as FreeDem noted, not locked away---- and so it was treated like any other income into the Treasury, spent on other things by Congress, and little IOUs replaced the cash in the accountant's records (so Granny is right, her 'premiums' evaporated just as her retirement account on Wall Street evaporated---- which has to make the Republican agrument for privatizing social security look stupid to even the most die-hard Republican). Not all taxes are necessarily fungible---- some are, uh, 'earmarked' and put away into lockboxes for very specific purposes (but manipulative governors can still find a way to 'borrow' from the box).
Contract: FreeDem is correct, Alpha Granny never had a written contract with Uncle Sam for what she thinks of as her annuity. However, as a Realtor I am only too aware that a contract can be created without paperwork between a professional licensee and a member of the public by perception; moreover, you can sell your house on a verbal agreement, no signatures required---- and judges have consistently found against the professional and in favor of the average member of the public when the member of the public assumed/perceived they had a contract (for representation in real estate matters). When Granny saw the deductions on her paystub for Social Security, and saw retirees relying on receipt of regular payments from Social Security, it's only reasonable for her to perceive she had a contract to get her own regular payments from the fund into which she made payments. In other words, she indeed has a contract. We take care of each other. American society does not have disposable people.
Cost Living 'adjustment': We all agree the BLS stats, especially for COL are, well, somewhat odd, but let's be careful here: Alpha Granny's cost of living may be different from that of the average, younger working stiff---- more on health care, less on entertainment, maybe? Stats are too easily manipulated ("figures don't lie, but liars figure")---- Granny's afraid that COL-tweaking is the thin edge of the wedge. Once Social Security is on the table the tweaking will aboslutely not stop with COL.
Simple fix would include raising the cap on the amount of salary subject to the SS tax (ahem, premium), which would rake in the sheckels to meet demand. Richard Nixon, of all people, once talked about instituting an 'incomes policy' which would have ensured every American of a bare minimum income, at the time he did not mean just the elderly. Social Security is an incomes policy; Norway is using the take from their North Sea oil wells to set up such a policy, especially for retirees... so it's not unheard of among civilized societies.
Health care cost is the killer and that's a War and Peace-sized story but the simplest thing would be single-payer universal minimum care (including preventive) and private medigap insurance, if we could re-educate people away from the no-tax Grover Norquist pledge, and realize that you get what you pay for, and the best things in life are not free.

Just give poor old Alpha Granny her due.  


Betrayed Also......... (0.00 / 0)
Although my situation is different that Granny's I can empathize. Four years ago I sold my house in the northeast, retired and moved to VA since I could no longer afford the costs of living in the north. My original plan was to supplement my state government pension with interest income from savings but we all know what has happened to interest rates thanks to the Wall Street gambling cartel.
   The loss of interest income and the need to spend my savings capital made me go to plan B which was to apply for social security at 62 instead of later. Now the GOP hero Chris Christie (NJ governor) is trying to fiddle with my NJ State Pension and the national GOP is trying to decrease my Social Security benefits. I worked and contributed to both of these systems for 45 years which means I am not asking for a "handout"
  To the same individuals who Granny addresses I ask, please tell me what my "plan C" should be since you want to make my "plan B" unworkable ?
  There are simple changes that can be made to SS that would ensure it's continued health such as removing the income cap on contributions but since this would affect individuals at higher income levels the GOP will torpedo any such changes.

"...the GOP eill torpedo any such changes." (0.00 / 0)
says that therefore every thoughtful American should torpedo the GOP at the ballot box... always watching out for their fiddling with the vote, of course.

This entire mess, brought to us by an ideological and religious devotion to a special chapter in the Free Market economic theory is compounded, IMO, by a peculiarly American idea that the universe owes them something for nothing, a manna-from heaven belief that, magically, goodies they want will appear---- a sort of cargo cult for modern times. I personally think it arises from what I call the Santa Claus sydrome, and they learn it as toddlers: if you're good, Santa will drop rewards down the chimney, and the toddler never realizes some one paid for the rewards with cold, hard, cash (or plastic, that is).


[ Parent ]
The Great Betrayal | 19 comments
Advertising

Donate to Blue Virginia

About
The purpose of Blue Virginia is to cover Virginia politics from a progressive and Democratic perspective. This is a group blog and a community blog. We invite everyone to comment here, but please be aware that profanity, personal attacks, bigotry, insults, rudeness, frequent unsupported or off-point statements, and "trolling" (NOTE: that includes outright lies, whether about climate science, or what other people said, or whatever) are not permitted and, if continued, will lead to banning. For more on trolling, see the Daily Kos FAQs. Also note that diaries may be deleted if they do not contain at least 2 solid paragraphs of original text; if not, please use the comments section of a relevant diary. For more on writing diaries, click here. Thanks, and enjoy!

P.S. You can contact us at lowell@raisingkaine.com and you can subscribe to Lowell's Twitter feed here. If you'd like to subscribe to Miles Grant's Twitter feed, click here. For Teacherken, click here. For Kindler, click here.

P.P.S. To see the Blue Virginia archive, please click here. To see the Raising Kaine archive, please click here. To see the Blue Commonwealth archive, please click here.



RSS Feed

Subscribe to Blue Virginia - Front Page


Powered by: SoapBlox