Blog Roll
Who's My Legislator?

Virginia Blogs
All Things Education
Augusta Free Press
Crew of 42
Dixie Pig
Greater Greater Washington
Loudoun Progress
Ox Road South Blog
Pilot on Politics" blog
Power for the People
Richmond Sunlight
RVA Politics
Shad Plank
Vivian Paige

Find more about Weather in Arlington, VA
Click for weather forecast

Advanced Search

Robert Hurt Outright Lies; PolitiFact Goes Easy on Him

by: lowkell

Tue Apr 12, 2011 at 15:24:18 PM EDT

Overall, I think that PolitiFact Virginia does a pretty good job in sorting out the lies from the truth among Virginia politicians. Unfortunately, PolitiFact doesn't always do a good job. For instance, I recently wrote about PolitiFact rating an audacious claim by Bob McDonnell on supposedly "balancing" Virginia's budget as "barely true." Wait a second, how can something that's totally false, by PolitiFact's own analysis, be "barely true?" Got me.

Today, there's another one where PolitiFact's being way too generous: this "barely true" rating of Robert Hurt's outright lie on "cap and trade" and jobs. First, the outright lie:

In a newsletter to his 5th District constituents, Hurt detailed his efforts to cut the Environmental Protection Agency's budget. The freshman congressman wrote he is "a co-sponsor of H.R. 153, which would prohibit any funds at the EPA from being used to implement a cap-and-trade system that would harm our agriculture and manufacturing sectors, destroy over 50,000 jobs in Virginia, and amount to a job-crushing national energy tax when we can least afford it."
If you wade down into the PolitiFact article, you'll find that, in fact, the non-partisan Congressional Budget Office clearly says that although jobs in carbon-intensive fuels like coal would probably decrease, employment would "increase in sectors that require fewer emissions, such as nuclear, solar and wind power," resulting in "only a small effect on total employment" overall.

In addition, if you wade further into PolitiFact's analysis of Hurt's outright lie, you'll also find that Hurt cited "solely from a short report by the National Association of opponent of the legislation." Yeah, that's really credible (not)!

Apparently, in PolitiFact Virginia's world, as long as you can attribute something to a "study," even a completely biased and phony one by opponents of the very thing they're supposedly "studying," PolitiFact Virginia won't just outright say it's false. Lame.

In reality, as Harvard economist Jeffrey Frankel points out, "the NAM analysis ignores the jobs that would be created due to a growth in new, non-emission technologies." The bottom line, as Frankel explains, is that "most economists would agree...the jobs created would approximately equal the jobs lost."

To summarize: there's no indication whatsoever, at least from anyone unbiased and knowledgeable, that Hurt's claim about cap-and-trade "destroy[ing] over 50,000 jobs in Virginia" is in the slightest bit true. So why the extremely lenient, "barely true" rating from PolitiFact Virginia? This one should be "pants on fire" all the way!

lowkell :: Robert Hurt Outright Lies; PolitiFact Goes Easy on Him
Tags: , , , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email

No one should be surprised that Robert Hurt (0.00 / 0)
lied about this job loss claim.  He claimed essentially the same thing during the campaign.  He is nothing but a talking head for Republican stances.  He has not shown the ability  to research, study and come to an objective conclusion about any issue.  He is not interested in representing his constituency, because he needs to repay the corporations and  Republican PACs for all the money they gave him during the campaign.  He is nothing more than their mouthpiece.

In 2006, Virginia had a total of (4.00 / 1)
5,262 coal mining jobs and 1,117 coal-fired power plant jobs, for a total of about 6,400 jobs directly related to coal. In other words, even if cap-and-trade caused ALL of those to be lost, and NONE to be offset by other jobs in clean energy, we wouldn't even be close to Hurt's Big Lie of 50,000 job losses due to cap-and-trade. He's just completely full of it.

Follow me on Twitter. Follow Blue Virginia on Facebook and Twitter.

Small point (0.00 / 0)
I agree his number is misleading, cynical, and disingenuous at best and malicious at worst, but he's talking about the shuttering of manufacturing and generation plants, not just coal jobs. I still think his number is absurd and tells a small fraction of the story, but there is some legitimate concern about the costs associated with purchasing credits/retrofitting facilities under a cap and trade plan.

What Hurt has never answered for is his support of the utility re-reg which let ApCo jack rates through the roof on businesses AND residents. Manufacturers in his district told him this was a terrible idea and he went for it anyways: http://www.martinsvillebulleti...


[ Parent ]
Why would manufacturing and generation plants (0.00 / 0)
be shuttered if dirty energy was replaced by clean energy, especially given how rapidly the costs of producing clean energy are plummeting?  Hurt's an imbecile.

Follow me on Twitter. Follow Blue Virginia on Facebook and Twitter.

[ Parent ]
Not to mention (0.00 / 0)
Hurt represents Southside, and the overwhelming majority of those jobs are in Southwest. Sure, Morgan Griffith would probably have said the same thing had these talking points been forwarded to him instead, but it's not even HIS district. Someone needs to demagogue the hell out of the APC rate hike junk this year and in 2013.

I belong to no organized party. I am a Democrat.

~Will Rogers

[ Parent ]
No, giving a Politifacts franchise to the RTD was a mistake (0.00 / 0)
While I like the idea of Politifacts in general, it was a huge mistake for them to give a Politifacts franchise to the RTD.  The RTD has shamelessly used its Politifacts franchise to promote the RPV's agenda.

Compare the treatment of Dems and Reps.  The RTD always shades the Reps one frame "honester" and the Dems one frame "dishonester."  It's subtle, but like everything else the RTD does, it works to undermine Democrats, Liberals, and Progressives and works to promote Republicans, conservatives, and teabaggers.

The Richmonder

Yep, that's the Republican Times-Disgrace (4.00 / 1)
for ya!

Follow me on Twitter. Follow Blue Virginia on Facebook and Twitter.

[ Parent ]

Make a New Account



Forget your username or password?



Donate to Blue Virginia

The purpose of Blue Virginia is to cover Virginia politics from a progressive and Democratic perspective. This is a group blog and a community blog. We invite everyone to comment here, but please be aware that profanity, personal attacks, bigotry, insults, rudeness, frequent unsupported or off-point statements, "trolling" (NOTE: that includes outright lies, whether about climate science, or what other people said, or whatever), and "troll ratings abuse" (e.g., "troll" rating someone simply because you disagree with their argument) are not permitted and, if continued, will lead to banning. For more on trolling, see the Daily Kos FAQs. Also note that diaries may be deleted if they do not contain at least 2 solid paragraphs of original text; if not, please use the comments section of a relevant diary. For more on writing diaries, click here. Thanks, and enjoy!

P.S. You can contact us at and you can subscribe to Lowell's Twitter feed here. If you'd like to subscribe to Miles Grant's Twitter feed, click here. For Teacherken, click here. For Kindler, click here.

P.P.S. To see the Blue Virginia archive, please click here. To see the Raising Kaine archive, please click here. To see the Blue Commonwealth archive, please click here.

RSS Feed

Subscribe to Blue Virginia - Front Page

Powered by: SoapBlox