I frankly don't know much about him. He is already asleep.
The poll said the ant-Obama, tea-party rant had peaked, and that too many in the GOP had bought into it. She included Allen in that category. In some ways that seems odd since Allen is facing a Tea Party challenger. But on the other hand, he has basically gone that route politically in his statements this past year.
I am not sure I agree.
But her big point was Allen's weak profile with young voters and his platform, to the extent they could poll it, She said it showed he had little hope of improving it.
Kaine's connection with Obama proved a big help there.
Perriello also seemed to connect.
The older, anti-Obama voter was, as they say a cooking school, already baked into the cake.
She said the election would be decided among swing voters 50 and younger, along with turnout among those 35 and younger, in her opinion.
I have no idea if this is true. It strikes me that vote maxed out in 2008. The groups that stayed home where strongly anti-Obama last year.
But if you buy her thesis, then to the key voters, Kaine had a powerful message, less so for Perriello but still potent.
Almost non-existence for Allen right now.
53-47% is a big win for VA Democrat facing a real contest.
Actually, it seems too big. Historically, a national Democratic connection has hurt here in Virginia. But things are changing.
Bottom line: If she is right, then Allen needs a Kaine screw-up, a tanking economy, a world can to hell, or a serious reboot from Senator Reload to have a chance of winning.
Allen only controls one of those paths. So far, he isn't going near that one either.
SO: If you get to this time next year and Kaine is a serious +6 - not 40-34 but in the 46-40 with the usual independent, younger bias to the undecided, then look for the national Republicans to try and find someone to challenge Allen in the primary.
Giving Kaine's history, he figures to get stronger, not weaker, as election day nears. |