Blog Roll
Who's My Legislator?

Virginia Blogs
All Things Education
Augusta Free Press
Crew of 42
Dixie Pig
Greater Greater Washington
Loudoun Progress
Ox Road South Blog
Pilot on Politics" blog
Power for the People
Richmond Sunlight
RVA Politics
Shad Plank
Vivian Paige

Find more about Weather in Arlington, VA
Click for weather forecast

Advanced Search

Mark Warner "Disappointed in Tax Deal"

by: lowkell

Wed Dec 08, 2010 at 11:23:39 AM EST

According to Mark Warner, "This basically takes a traditional Washington approach of, 'Let's add to the deficit and kick the can down the road.'" I tend to agree. What's the overall strategy here? How do we reconcile the deficit commission's work with extending the unaffordable Bush tax cuts?  As for short-term "stimulus," again I'm not a huge fan if it's just scattershot, throw a few dollars here and there. On the other hand, if it's serious reinvestment in our nation's crumbling infrastructure, in a clean energy economy, etc., that's a completely different story. And, of course, any tax cuts need to be progressive, not regressive, as the Bush tax cuts for the wealthiest Americans most certainly are (not to mention the estate tax, which is the most progressive tax ever invented and should have its rates raised significantly, not lowered).
lowkell :: Mark Warner "Disappointed in Tax Deal"
Tags: , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email

This is why it is pointless to align yourself with Republicans (4.00 / 1)
If you really care about the deficit, and I believe that Warner really does care, this should be a wake up call to him that most Republicans simply don't.  Oh, they talk about it more than Democrats do, sure, but when it comes to getting what they want (in their case, tax cuts) EVERYTHING else falls to the side.  Perhaps Warner will remember that this deal isn't only Obama's deal, but also the very Republicans he was insisting not more than few weeks ago were concerned with the same things that he was.  Bottom line -- they weren't.

May Seem Contradictory (0.00 / 0)
This is not a good POLICY deal.  It is a somewhat better political deal, but not so great on that level either.  We have take our lump & move on.

I hope we move quickly back to a path of responsible fiscal management coupled with sound investment in green infrastructure.  As much as possible anyway.  The Administration should do it unilaterally as much as possible or muscle it through the Senate to gain leverage.

Not sure why we need to do that. (0.00 / 0)
This thing's far from a sure bet to pass Congress, let's take one step at a time.

Follow me on Twitter. Follow Blue Virginia on Facebook and Twitter.

[ Parent ]

Make a New Account



Forget your username or password?



Donate to Blue Virginia

The purpose of Blue Virginia is to cover Virginia politics from a progressive and Democratic perspective. This is a group blog and a community blog. We invite everyone to comment here, but please be aware that profanity, personal attacks, bigotry, insults, rudeness, frequent unsupported or off-point statements, "trolling" (NOTE: that includes outright lies, whether about climate science, or what other people said, or whatever), and "troll ratings abuse" (e.g., "troll" rating someone simply because you disagree with their argument) are not permitted and, if continued, will lead to banning. For more on trolling, see the Daily Kos FAQs. Also note that diaries may be deleted if they do not contain at least 2 solid paragraphs of original text; if not, please use the comments section of a relevant diary. For more on writing diaries, click here. Thanks, and enjoy!

P.S. You can contact us at and you can subscribe to Lowell's Twitter feed here. If you'd like to subscribe to Miles Grant's Twitter feed, click here. For Teacherken, click here. For Kindler, click here.

P.P.S. To see the Blue Virginia archive, please click here. To see the Raising Kaine archive, please click here. To see the Blue Commonwealth archive, please click here.

RSS Feed

Subscribe to Blue Virginia - Front Page

Powered by: SoapBlox