Home | Virginia
Politics
| National
Politics
Menu

Make a New Account

Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?


Poll
Should Democrats Move Their Convention Out of North Carolina?
No, I agree with the anti-gay-marriage amendment
No, lots of states have these amendments
No, it's too late to change
No, we want to win North Carolina this November
Yes, we need to take a stand against bigotry
Yes, NC's amendment is particularly heinous
Yes, we're not going to win NC anyway
Yes for many reasons

Results

Weather

Search




Advanced Search


Blog Roll
Virginia Blogs
All Politics is Local
Augusta Free Press
Bacon's Rebellion
Coarse Cracked Corn
Crew of 42
DemRulz
Dixie Pig
Equality Loudoun
The Fix (WaPo)
Greater Greater Washington
The Green Miles
Leaving My Marc
Leesburg Tomorrow
Loudoun Progress
Moonhowlings
New Dominion Project
Not Larry Sabato
Off K Street
Old Dominion Blogs
Ox Road South Blog
Renaissance Ruminations
Richmonder
Richmond Sunlight
RTD VA Politics blog
Roanoke Times blog
Shad Plank
SlantBlog
Too Conservative
True Adventures of the Doorbell Queen
VB Dems
Virginia Education Report
WaPo - Virginia Politics Blog
Waldo Jaquith
Waldo's VA Political Blogroll

Progressive Legal Directory www.criminallawyervirginia.net
www.virginia-duilawyers.com
www.virginia-personalinjurylawyer.com
www.recklessdrivinglawyer.net
www.helpdisabilitylawyer.com
www.criminallawdc.com
www.duilawsdc.com

ADT Home Security in Virginia

CNN Poll: Only 38% Disapprove of Obama Because He's "Too Liberal"

by: lowkell

Mon Nov 15, 2010 at 15:06:31 PM EST


Fascinating poll results from CNN. In particular, I enjoyed the question about whether or not you approve of President Obama's job performance, and if you disapprove, whether it's because he's "too liberal" or "not liberal enough."

The results: 48% approve of Obama, 38% disapprove of Obama because he's "too liberal," 9% disapprove of Obama because he's "not liberal enough", and 3% disapprove but aren't sure whether it's because he's "too liberal" or "not liberal enough." The bottom line here is that only 38% of Americans disapprove of Obama because he's "too liberal." There's also the 3% who aren't sure why they disapprove of Obama. On the other side are 48% who approve of Obama and 9% who disapprove because he's "not liberal enough." That adds up to a potential 57% approval rating if Obama would push harder for things like the public option, clean energy and climate legislation, the end of "Don't Ask Don't Tell," card check, immigration reform, etc.

So, given these poll results - not to mention what constitutes good public policy - which direction should Obama move at this point, left or right? Based on these poll numbers, it doesn't appear that moving right will help him much in the polls, while moving left could pick up some support and put him nicely over 50%. Which makes it all the more puzzling to see Obama apparently tilting towards the right, as opposed to fighting the Republicans and standing up for Democratic, "liberal," and/or "progressive" ideals. Weird.

P.S. Another interesting finding of this poll is that the Republican Party continues to be slightly less popular than the Democratic Party (46%-48% for Democrats, 43%-48% for Republicans). Also, only 17% of Americans believe the recent elections were a "mandate for Republicans." So, again, what do Democrats lose by sticking to their guns on health care, clean energy and environment, etc?

UPDATE: Jed Lewison at Daily Kos sees it the same way.

lowkell :: CNN Poll: Only 38% Disapprove of Obama Because He's "Too Liberal"
Tags: (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email

"Potential 57%" (0.00 / 0)
That adds up to a potential 57% approval rating if Obama would push harder

Eh, maybe. I'd argue its more likely that, as Obama moves to the left to pick up that 9%, he'd lose more of that 48%. It's tough to just assume they'd approve of him unconditionally.

The other thing to be careful of in national polls like these (not taken in the midst of an electoral cycle) is that this is a poll of national adults, not "likely voters" or even registered voters. While that makes perfect sense, and it has value because all adults are constituents of President Obama regardless of if they voted or who they voted for, "likely voters" are the political currency that drive strategic decisions.


I'm shocked you'd say that. (0.00 / 0)
:)

Follow me on Twitter.

[ Parent ]
The issue... (0.00 / 0)
Is that none of what you have said has any realistic chance of passing. Any dramatic action for clean energy/climate change and the public option are  dead. It was hard enough with our "super majorities" and now with the House in GOP control and 60 being the new 50 in the Senate getting major stuff done is going to be impossible. Immigration too likely is done as maybe  he can get through something small but I seriously doubt anything like comprehensive immigration reform or the Dream Act can pass now. Doesn't mean he shouldn't try but the House is in GOP hands and likely won't be playing ball with him anytime for the next 2 years. They will probably care about holding votes about stripping the first gay American of his/her citizenship posthumously. He needs to focus on very small popular components of an issue like a bill for extra border security, a bill meant to crack down on employers hiring of undocumented workers and then a bill that would allow for a pathway to citizenship with respect to immigration.

I generally agree, I'm just arguing that Obama (0.00 / 0)
shouldn't think that caving to Republicans is what a majority of the American people want him to do, what is good public policy, or what will benefit him politically.

Follow me on Twitter.

[ Parent ]
Gotcha (0.00 / 0)
I totally agree. Part of the problem with our "super majorities" is that they created unrealistic expectations. The general public figured that since we had 60 votes that anything we wanted would get done and with these super majorities we should fix every single problem. Little problem was that we never really had 60. Coleman pulled the litigation crap, Kennedy/Byrd were sick and getting Nelson, Lincoln and Lieberman on board was never easy so we rarely had 60 votes. That and a determined minority party was willing to toss away any past agreements that they may have had in the name of obstruction (ask John McCain who could take part in a debate with himself).

Now? He has no expectations that "super majorities" have and is free to do what he wants. He can continue and should continue to try and work with the GOP but he knows and we know that he won't get anything so you just move on. There is no reason why he shouldn't take apart small pieces of legislation that are very popular and say to the GOP "you are not listening to the people, this is what they want not what your base wants." Things like repealing DADT, Dream Act, green energy schools and public buildings are things that should normally have lots of bi-partisan support but won't. His job is to point that out. Thankfully we won't have to endure 3 months of waiting on Olympia Snowe's demands.


[ Parent ]
Tone (4.00 / 1)
It's not so much what I think that Obama (and Democrats in general) will do or not do, but the tone they are taking is really getting on my nerves.

My husband just chewed out some poor DPVA telemarketer because he gave his pitch about all of the terrible things that are going to happen to us, unless we ponied up money RIGHT NOW.  We live in a great country, with endless possibilities.  I'm tired to death of living in a culture of fear and shame and cowardice, and I don't need Democrats playing along!


Amen (0.00 / 0)
I too am tired of this. I am a liberal and dam proud of it. I believe in focus economic help and I believe that MY taxes ought to go to helping others help themselves.  We don't have Democratic Congressman or definitely Senators who believe this as a core part of their being and thus are subject to the "whims of fear" that pervade our politics.

Less on Defense, more on job re-training. Less on trying to get jobs and markets that are lost to us and more on getting new markets and new jobs and associated skills. More on INVESTIMENTS; people, infrastructure, ed-u-ma-kation, end the war on drugs, pathways to citizenship while much tougher at our boarders (both our boarders, those pesky Canuks!) focus on the middle class before their extinct!
     


[ Parent ]
That same 38 - 40% (0.00 / 0)
There's apparently about 35 to 40% or so of the people pollsters call who are just Fox News/Limbaugh/Palin/GOP foot soldiers. In this economy, there may be more of them, but basically these are the same rich people/deluded Christians who backed Bush, Rove and every other idiot who comes down the Republican pike. The real danger is that Republicans are desperately trying to grow them, while we have to convert them.

Advertising

Donate to Blue Virginia

About
The purpose of Blue Virginia is to cover Virginia politics from a progressive and Democratic perspective. This is a group blog and a community blog. We invite everyone to comment here, but please be aware that profanity, personal attacks, bigotry, insults, rudeness, frequent unsupported or off-point statements, and "trolling" (NOTE: that includes outright lies, whether about climate science, or what other people said, or whatever) are not permitted and, if continued, will lead to banning. For more on trolling, see the Daily Kos FAQs. Also note that diaries may be deleted if they do not contain at least 2 solid paragraphs of original text; if not, please use the comments section of a relevant diary. For more on writing diaries, click here. Thanks, and enjoy!

P.S. You can contact us at lowell@raisingkaine.com and you can subscribe to Lowell's Twitter feed here. If you'd like to subscribe to Miles Grant's Twitter feed, click here. For Teacherken, click here. For Kindler, click here.

P.P.S. To see the Blue Virginia archive, please click here. To see the Raising Kaine archive, please click here. To see the Blue Commonwealth archive, please click here.



RSS Feed

Subscribe to Blue Virginia - Front Page


Powered by: SoapBlox