Blog Roll
Who's My Legislator?

Virginia Blogs
All Things Education
Augusta Free Press
Crew of 42
Dixie Pig
Greater Greater Washington
Loudoun Progress
Ox Road South Blog
Pilot on Politics" blog
Power for the People
Richmond Sunlight
RVA Politics
Shad Plank
Vivian Paige

Find more about Weather in Arlington, VA
Click for weather forecast

Advanced Search

More Evidence Republicans Are the Anti-Science, Pro-Theocracy Party

by: lowkell

Mon Jan 06, 2014 at 18:55:50 PM EST

A few days ago, the Pew Research Center reported its disturbing - but sadly not surprising - finding that Republican "belief" in evolution has plummeted in recent years. I put "belief" in quotes, because any educated person should know that science has nothing whatsoever to do with "belief," but about data collection, hypothesis development, rigorous testing and experimentation, etc. In short, science is about empiricism and rationality, the opposite of "belief," religion, theology, etc.

Anyway, the pathetic and disturbing bottom line is that only 43% of Republicans agree with the overwhelming scientific evidence that humans - like all other species - have evolved over time. This compares to 67% of Democrats and 65% of Independents, both of which are also pathetically low percentages, but still 20+ points better than Republicans. This would be bad enough if it were isolated to one branch of science, albeit an absolutely crucial one. But it isn't.

Instead, Republicans also don't "believe" in other major scientific findings, such as that human-emitted greenhouse gases are causing climate change. Of course, climate science also has been demonstrated and validated/refined by overwhelming empirical evidence, collected over more than a century, in addition to tremendous grounding in scientific theory (and no, the word "theory" in science does not mean what it does in popular usage). Yet according to Pew, only 24% of Republicans (and something like 9% of Tea Partiers) give the scientifically accurate answer that human activity is the primary cause of global warming, compared to 66% of Democrats and 43% of Independents. Again, those are pathetic numbers among Democrats and Independents, but still far better than among Republicans, let alone Tea Partiers.

The bottom line is that on two of the best-supported scientific matters, Republicans - and particularly the Tea Party branch - are unequivocally the "stupid party," as Louisiana Gov. Bobby Jindal (R) put it. More evidence of this disturbing phenenomenon can be found right here in Virginia, as Josh Israel of Think Progress reports:

A new bill, up for consideration this year in the Virginia General Assembly, would give Virginia’s public school teachers permission to teach about the “scientific strengths and scientific weaknesses” of “scientific theories” like evolution and global climate change. The bill is part of a national trend of legislative proposals, led by creationist organizations like the Discovery Institute and climate-change deniers such as the Heartland Institute.

Virginia State Delegate Richard “Dickie” Bell (R) pre-filed House Bill 207 over the holidays for consideration by the House of Delegates when it reconvenes this week. His proposal would require Virginia elementary and secondary schools to teach about “scientific controversies” in science classes.  

This is obviously unacceptable and should receive ZERO votes in the Virginia General Assembly. I mean, it's one thing for rank-and-file Republicans, Independents, or Democrats to be scientific ignoramuses, but our supposed leaders certainly have no excuse (other than pandering to said ignoramuses). Yet here we are, with a bill to require Virginia public school teachers to actually teach children how NOT to think scientifically, and basically how NOT to be competitive in a 21st century economy in which understanding of science and technology are paramount. It's utterly appalling, and we should all be watching VERY closely to see who votes for this trash. Frankly, anyone who does so should be automatically disqualified from holding public office. But since that's not possible, the least we can do is make sure we vote against anyone who does so, strongly support their opponent, and otherwise let them know our displeasure at their anti-science, pro-theocracy attitudes.
lowkell :: More Evidence Republicans Are the Anti-Science, Pro-Theocracy Party
Tags: , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email

Thank you, Lowell, for this excellent piece (0.00 / 0)
If we knew nothing more about this Republican Party than that it makes alliance with ignorance and bigotry and shows no signs of intellectual integrity, that would be enough to tell us that the spirit that drives this party is dark and destructive.

But of course we know so much more about that Party, and pretty much all the other facets are dark as well-- the greed, the lust for power, the willingness to  torture, the divisiveness, the lack of willingness to put the greater good ahead of the quest for advantage, the insistence that our politics be a kind of war.

Agreed, especially re: the Tea Party faction. (0.00 / 0)
Although as I said in the article, I'm disturbed by the low levels of "belief" in science by Democrats and Independents as well. Essentially, a significant share of Americans are physically living in the 21st century (e.g., benefiting from science and technology) but intellectually stuck in the Dark Ages (pre-enlightenment, pre-Renaissance).

Follow me on Twitter. Follow Blue Virginia on Facebook and Twitter.

[ Parent ]
Off topic (0.00 / 0)
Lowellk, have you read the read to "sanctions" bill Mark Warner has co-sponsored?  Normally, I'm a big fan of Warner, in fact, I can't think of any time I've disagreed with him in the past.  However, this is a truly dangerous piece of legislation, besides scuttling negotiations with new sanctions it would essentially give Israel the green light to drag us into a war it might start with Iran.   I don't know how else to read this part of Senate Bill 1881.

if the Government of Israel is compelled to take military action in legitimate self-defense against Iran's nuclear weapon program, the United States Government should stand with Israel and provide, in accordance with the law of the United States and the constitutional responsibility of Congress to authorize the use of military force, diplomatic, military, and economic support to the Government of Israel in its defense of its territory, people, and existence

I added the bold.  I have no illusions about Iran, but since when do we outsource decisions on the use of the American military to other countries?   What is Senator Warner thinking?

Yes, I'm not happy with Warner on that one at all. (0.00 / 0)

Follow me on Twitter. Follow Blue Virginia on Facebook and Twitter.

[ Parent ]
I also asked his office for comment, and they (0.00 / 0)
didn't respond. Hmmmm.

Follow me on Twitter. Follow Blue Virginia on Facebook and Twitter.

[ Parent ]
Lieberman 2.0 (0.00 / 0)
Senator Menendez of New Jersey has turned into Lieberman 2.0 over this. Even Steny Hoyer, AIPAC's favorite member of the Democratic leadership team and best buddy of Eric Cantor on these issues, has wisely stayed away. Unfortunately, a number of less savvy Democrats got on board because they thought this was just another check the box on Israel situation. Really shows that Mark Warner is still a domestic policy guy with a focus on economics.

[ Parent ]
From Nate Wilcox's and my book (4.00 / 1)
Netroots Rising: How a Citizen Army of Bloggers and Online Activists Is Changing American Politics, the following seems like a relevant passage (see in particular the parts I've bolded):
As the Webb-Miller primary wound to its conclusion, former Virginia Governor Mark Warner and his team -- which now included Nate Wilcox, recruited by Jerome Armstrong just months earlier -- set off for the Yearly Kos convention at the Riviera hotel in Las Vegas.  This was the first-ever national convention of the netroots, and politicians were eager to win them over.  Mark Warner, who was considering a run for president, was slated to give the keynote speech, while Warner's Forward Together PAC was footing the bill for the biggest party of the convention.  The Riviera hotel's facilities were not adequate for a party of 1,500 people, and the only nearby casinos were the run-down Circus Circus and the silly Stratosphere.   A modest party in a basement room at the Circus Circus would cost nearly as much as a major blowout at the Stratosphere, an over-the-top Las Vegas hotel featuring roller coasters on the roof.  The Warner camp chose the Stratosphere.

The situation quickly went downhill, as several bloggers (including a few who supported presidential candidates other than Mark Warner) reacted strongly to what they viewed as the decadence of the chocolate fountains and ice sculptures at the party.  Warner was criticized for the chocolate fountain on the blogosphere, to the Warner team's dismay.  Even worse, Warner's interview with a group of bloggers following his (well-received) keynote speech was a disaster.  Warner, whose foreign policy positions were still being formulated, came across to the strongly anti-war bloggers at Yearly Kos as conservative, possibly even the hated and dreaded "neo-conservative."

Follow me on Twitter. Follow Blue Virginia on Facebook and Twitter.

[ Parent ]
Why He's Stuck in 2016 (0.00 / 0)
Take a look at Governor Cuomo of New York for a potential Democratic nominee who knows how to use social issues to boost their standing among primary voters.

I'm actually shocked that Warner, despite all the talk about running for President for the past decade, has never caught on to the realities of the Democratic Party.

Moderate Southern Governor doesn't work anymore.

He's done nothing to define himself as a champion of social equality. He's certainly no economic populist. And he's totally regressive on foreign policy.

Tim Kaine is going to have a much brighter future nationally than Mark Warner.

[ Parent ]
wonder if it includes the study of "bigfoot"? (0.00 / 0)
Some folks believe Bigfoot lives in the mountains of is "scientifically controversial",  there are reality shows geared to finding "bigfoot", and there are plenty of people who believe in bigfoot.

The question to answer is; who/what benefits from a citizenry that does not "believe" in science or science fact..such as climate change/shift...and parades it around as "controversy".


Make a New Account



Forget your username or password?



Donate to Blue Virginia

The purpose of Blue Virginia is to cover Virginia politics from a progressive and Democratic perspective. This is a group blog and a community blog. We invite everyone to comment here, but please be aware that profanity, personal attacks, bigotry, insults, rudeness, frequent unsupported or off-point statements, "trolling" (NOTE: that includes outright lies, whether about climate science, or what other people said, or whatever), and "troll ratings abuse" (e.g., "troll" rating someone simply because you disagree with their argument) are not permitted and, if continued, will lead to banning. For more on trolling, see the Daily Kos FAQs. Also note that diaries may be deleted if they do not contain at least 2 solid paragraphs of original text; if not, please use the comments section of a relevant diary. For more on writing diaries, click here. Thanks, and enjoy!

P.S. You can contact us at and you can subscribe to Lowell's Twitter feed here. If you'd like to subscribe to Miles Grant's Twitter feed, click here. For Teacherken, click here. For Kindler, click here.

P.P.S. To see the Blue Virginia archive, please click here. To see the Raising Kaine archive, please click here. To see the Blue Commonwealth archive, please click here.

RSS Feed

Subscribe to Blue Virginia - Front Page

Powered by: SoapBlox